This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
Originally posted by Yossarian
$teauA, any links to South African stadiums, bro? I'd like to see them
Originally posted by djperthglory
judging by the pics of the stadia on the first page i cant see south africa not winning the right to host the most coveted football event in 2010!!!
the winner is
SOUTH AFRICA
Originally posted by claupastore
get an architechture title and build it yerself
the idea that the host country has to be good its stupid
so i guess the little countries can kiss goodbye a chance to host the WC right?
Originally posted by Psyatika
The USA is never going to host the cricket world cup (thank god), because we would be wasting everyone's time.
Originally posted by Psyatika
Well, yes!
Why would Luxembourg need the World Cup, or the Olympics or anything for that matter?
If your nation can't even perform competitively in the event, why should it be there? The USA is never going to host the cricket world cup (thank god), because we would be wasting everyone's time.
The host nation performing well makes things more interesting, because they get a serious home advantage from it. If they're not going to be competitive, why bother giving them home advantage?
And since everyone at my dorm is banned from SG for some reason, i will not be seeing your reply until next Thursday, if i bother. Which i won't. Later.
Originally posted by Pontiakos
south africa ....but they'll need one new one at at least 90,000
Originally posted by Psyatika
Well, yes!
Why would Luxembourg need the World Cup, or the Olympics or anything for that matter?
If your nation can't even perform competitively in the event, why should it be there? The USA is never going to host the cricket world cup (thank god), because we would be wasting everyone's time.
The host nation performing well makes things more interesting, because they get a serious home advantage from it. If they're not going to be competitive, why bother giving them home advantage?
And since everyone at my dorm is banned from SG for some reason, i will not be seeing your reply until next Thursday, if i bother. Which i won't. Later.
And since everyone at my dorm is banned from SG for some reason, i will not be seeing your reply until next Thursday, if i bother. Which i won't. Later.
Originally posted by Nakamura
Yep, me too!
Anyway, South Africa and Tunisia are also two good possibilities.