-
This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
World Cup 2010...!
- Thread starter gasper000
- Start date
Eagle Winged
Youth Team
Look at the bottom of the 1st page in this thread.
The fact that Spain is not hosting the World Cup regardless of geography means that it is not Spain 2010....and the same for all the other rubbish some of you brainless mules have been saying
V
Virgo
Guest
People get mugged and killed every day in South Africa in a basis way over normal. If you can't mantain security as you are you will never mantain it during a world cup.
claupastore
Fan Favourite
south africa is kickin some serious booty 
I don't know...i would like to see the WC take place in a country that could actually have a legitimate shot at doing well. South Africa would be waste of a spot in the finals.
Tunisia, Morocco, and even Egypt could actually pull an upset in the Cup. It's like the USA in 1994...why bother? Mexico or even Jamaica would've actually had a chance at pulling upsets as hosts. I don't want to see the hosts go 0-0-3 with a -89 goal differential. I want to see them get far. And i think that of those nations, only Tunisia can conceivably pull off some upsets, with Morocco and Egypt right behind them.
But still, i vote for Egypt. They should build a stadium with a view of the pyramids. Maybe leave the South end of a stadium a little lower than normal so it could have an outside view and build the stadium to the north of a pyramid. I'd like to see that.
-Chas
Tunisia, Morocco, and even Egypt could actually pull an upset in the Cup. It's like the USA in 1994...why bother? Mexico or even Jamaica would've actually had a chance at pulling upsets as hosts. I don't want to see the hosts go 0-0-3 with a -89 goal differential. I want to see them get far. And i think that of those nations, only Tunisia can conceivably pull off some upsets, with Morocco and Egypt right behind them.
But still, i vote for Egypt. They should build a stadium with a view of the pyramids. Maybe leave the South end of a stadium a little lower than normal so it could have an outside view and build the stadium to the north of a pyramid. I'd like to see that.
-Chas
claupastore
Fan Favourite
get an architechture title and build it yerself 
the idea that the host country has to be good its stupid
so i guess the little countries can kiss goodbye a chance to host the WC right?
the idea that the host country has to be good its stupid
so i guess the little countries can kiss goodbye a chance to host the WC right?
djperthglory
Starting XI
judging by the pics of the stadia on the first page i cant see south africa not winning the right to host the most coveted football event in 2010!!!
the winner is
SOUTH AFRICA
the winner is
SOUTH AFRICA
that's the spirit. and everybody seems to have forgotten that South Africa SHOULD'VE won the hosting rights for the 2006 World Cup were it not for Charles Dempsey. he had the deciding vote and was told to vote for South Africa by the Oceania football governing body, but at the final minute suddenly had a change of heart and voted for Germany. i remember that day so well, we were listening to it at school, then when the voice announced "Germany" the whole country was like :s***: .
damn New Zealander
(no offence to Kiwis)Originally posted by claupastore
get an architechture title and build it yerself
the idea that the host country has to be good its stupid
so i guess the little countries can kiss goodbye a chance to host the WC right?
Well, yes!
Why would Luxembourg need the World Cup, or the Olympics or anything for that matter?
If your nation can't even perform competitively in the event, why should it be there? The USA is never going to host the cricket world cup (thank god), because we would be wasting everyone's time.
The host nation performing well makes things more interesting, because they get a serious home advantage from it. If they're not going to be competitive, why bother giving them home advantage?
And since everyone at my dorm is banned from SG for some reason, i will not be seeing your reply until next Thursday, if i bother. Which i won't. Later.
man united forever
Senior Squad
South Africa is the best-prepared nation atm. They did a great job hosting the Cricket World Cup last year and these stadiums regularly host Super 12 and Tri-Nations rugby matches. They're definitely the frontrunners in the race. Having said that, I'd love to see Egypt or Morocco hosting the tournament. They're both fantastic places to visit(I can say that about Egypt from experience, and Morocco looks great on the Discovery Channel
) and that would really add to the World Cup experience.
Actually, the USA will be hosting a couple of World Cup matches in 2007, so I suggest you head over to the Other Sports Forum and check out some of the threads to get up to speed. I've posted a link to the rules of the game there
.
) and that would really add to the World Cup experience.Actually, the USA will be hosting a couple of World Cup matches in 2007, so I suggest you head over to the Other Sports Forum and check out some of the threads to get up to speed. I've posted a link to the rules of the game there
.
so by your reasoning, the USA should not have hosted the 1994 World Cup? and South Korea and Japan should not have hosted the 2002 World Cup because they were not given any real chance of going far before it? that is just stupid. so then the World Cup would rotate between France, Italy, England, Brazil, Argentina, Germany, etc.
then the gap of wealth between bigger and smaller countries would widen even more. that is such an ignorant argument. smaller countries need events such as the World Cup or the Olympics b/c it helps increase their economy, dumbass. look at what the Sydney Olympics did for Australia, their economy soared because of the tourism, in no small part.
claupastore
Fan Favourite
you are dumb
everything in that post is almost funny
good try though
oh what a shame. WHO CARES!
Reggina_freak
Club Supporter
Originally posted by Nakamura
Yep, me too!
Anyway, South Africa and Tunisia are also two good possibilities.
OMG OMG!!!!!! N AK AMUR A!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FORZ A REGGIN A!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!