• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

Use of technology! Is it nessesary? Why?

S

Spurs4Life

Starting XI
Originally posted by bigp
And they could also put 2 refs on the field in each half so that the ref doesn't have to make calls from 20 metres out. This would
Click to expand...

:funny: errr...no. Btw it's been called football since the 1800's so it's football not soccer:p
 
H

hanek45

Min
Originally posted by bigp

And they could also put 2 refs on the field in each half so that the ref doesn't have to make calls from 20 metres out. This would make it easier to make the right call as the refs don't seem to be in shape to catch up on some of the plays
Click to expand...

I dont think so, What if the is a faul in the middle of the field and one ref says one thing and the other says another??? Too much dilema. Damn, there has to be a way to make games fair! :crazyboy:
 
S

santino

Fan Favourite
u guys say video tech will waste time? how much time musta been wasted to have 7 mins of injury time in the milan game?
 
H

hanek45

Min
Originally posted by santino
u guys say video tech will waste time? how much time musta been wasted to have 7 mins of injury time in the milan game?
Click to expand...

Does that mean ur against or in favor?? :crazyboy:
 
S

santino

Fan Favourite
im neither, im in the middle, video tech should be used only for controversial goals, where teams complain, and all 3 refs do not agree, if all 3 refs agree on the call, no review needed
 
H

hanek45

Min
Originally posted by santino
im neither, im in the middle, video tech should be used only for controversial goals, where teams complain, and all 3 refs do not agree, if all 3 refs agree on the call, no review needed
Click to expand...

Never thought of that... :o
Guess could be another way! Altough it would take some time to ask all 3 refs theyre op. IMaybe the refs could wear microphones so they could talk to each other... And yeah, i know u ppl will say that there are leagues that cant afford that knid of stuff, and i would have to say: Do it in the leagues that have the $$ enough.. ;)
 
B

bigp

Reserve Team
Originally posted by Spurs4Life
:funny: errr...no. Btw it's been called football since the 1800's so it's football not soccer:p
Click to expand...

Soccer means Association Football.

Originally posted by hanek45
: I dont think so, What if the is a faul in the middle of the field and one ref says one thing and the other says another??? Too much dilema. Damn, there has to be a way to make games fair!
Click to expand...

I think it would be rare for a foul to occur right in the middle of the field. The refs could decide before the game how they want the game to go so that there could be some consistency on the calls made
 
H

hanek45

Min
Originally posted by bigp
Soccer means Association Football.



I think it would be rare for a foul to occur right in the middle of the field. The refs could decide before the game how they want the game to go so that there could be some consistency on the calls made
Click to expand...

Fouls may occur anywhere in the field. And when I said in the mddle of the field, i didnt mean in the MIDDLE, i meant areas near the middle, or the middle :p
 
S

santino

Fan Favourite
fifa could experiment it in a league, just like the EPl were going to experiment a winter break....give it a shot, if it causes too much commotion, scrap it
 
C

claupastore

Fan Favourite
Originally posted by bigp



I think it would be rare for a foul to occur right in the middle of the field. The refs could decide before the game how they want the game to go so that there could be some consistency on the calls made
Click to expand...


what are you babbling about? :|
 
C

claupastore

Fan Favourite
-rare for a foul to occour in the middle of the field?
thats one thing

-refs could decide before the game how they want the game to go so that there could be some consistency on the calls made????
WTF! everything is wrong about that statement.

i thoght he wanted 2 refs to have less bad calls, but he says that refs could meet before the game to decide how the game will go? :|
 
S

Spurs4Life

Starting XI
Originally posted by santino
fifa could experiment it in a league, just like the EPl were going to experiment a winter break....give it a shot, if it causes too much commotion, scrap it
Click to expand...

It's fine the way it is!!. Jeez these damn Canadians and yanks:crazyboy:
 
M

monkee

Senior Squad
It's not a matter of asking the video ref for every call because that would spoil the flow of the game. It's more a case of if there's a natural stop, ie. a goal, that the referee is uncertain about then he can ask the video referee to check it for him. It's not as if the teams can ask for the replay, because that would be bollocks.

If the referee is uncertain about the legality of a goal (there'd be a 20sec pause anyway) then he can ask for assistance. If the player misses then there's no need for the replay, but if he scores a goal then why not?

But the referee's decision is final. If he doesn't want the video ref's opinion, whether the goal was legitimate or not, then he doesn't have to use the replay.

It won't slow the game down that way, and it will improve the fairness of the game, and that's a good thing imo.
 
K

Keemo

Senior Squad
Originally posted by Ljungberg08
Well, Chris Coleman is backing it.

We'll have to see what happens.
Click to expand...

Yes. What a joke that City/Fulham game was. Now we have the ref deliberatly ignoring an opposing teams' PK in order to cancel out his first bad call....two wrongs don't equal a right.
 
H

hanek45

Min
Originally posted by monkee
It's not a matter of asking the video ref for every call because that would spoil the flow of the game. It's more a case of if there's a natural stop, ie. a goal, that the referee is uncertain about then he can ask the video referee to check it for him. It's not as if the teams can ask for the replay, because that would be bollocks.

If the referee is uncertain about the legality of a goal (there'd be a 20sec pause anyway) then he can ask for assistance. If the player misses then there's no need for the replay, but if he scores a goal then why not?

But the referee's decision is final. If he doesn't want the video ref's opinion, whether the goal was legitimate or not, then he doesn't have to use the replay.

It won't slow the game down that way, and it will improve the fairness of the game, and that's a good thing imo.
Click to expand...

Thank you!
 
R

Rayzor127

Youth Team
Originally posted by HellsideUltras
whats your point? i dont see no "soccer" in association or football:crazyboy: :crazyboy: (H)
Click to expand...

The word "soccer" was derived many, many years ago in England from the "soc" in the word "asSOCiation". Get it now? Old news with many past posts.:crazyboy:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.


Top