• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

US Presidential Debates 2004

V

Virgo

Guest
btw they broadcasted 60 minutes here today with the Bill O'Reilly interview and they mentioned an interview of O'Reilly to Bush that they said it wasn't broadcasted yet but it's supposed to have O'Reilly asking unconfortable questions to Bush especially about the WMD.

Was this broadcasted yet? Are we supposed to expect something good out of this or just an interview where Bush will already know what he is going to be asked as O'Reilly is a right wing turd also?
 
E

Elder

Starting XI
Originally posted by Brondbyfan


Your second post is equally absurd. First off, everyone should note the irony of Elder complaining about "believing everything negative you hear about the guy you hate" . . . right before he posts a link from Matt Drudge. Shameful hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

You still believe the CBS memo's are real...

So before you go running around screaming about things I post not being "credible" I would make sure to take the foot out of your mouth first.

Or is it shoved so far up Kerry's ass that you can get it out? Oh wait, that was your big puckered lips, my bad!

:rolleyes:

3 weeks until your bankrupt ideology loses again... have fun.
 
E

Elder

Starting XI
Originally posted by Virgo
btw they broadcasted 60 minutes here today with the Bill O'Reilly interview and they mentioned an interview of O'Reilly to Bush that they said it wasn't broadcasted yet but it's supposed to have O'Reilly asking unconfortable questions to Bush especially about the WMD.

Was this broadcasted yet? Are we supposed to expect something good out of this or just an interview where Bush will already know what he is going to be asked as O'Reilly is a right wing turd also?
Click to expand...

It was aired over 3 or 4 nights last week, and yes, he asked him the tough questions. Supposedly Kerry is negotiating to come in before the election to do something similiar to what Bush did. But I don't expect him to do so as he can't answer any question that doesn't contradict anything he already said before.
 
E

Elder

Starting XI
Originally posted by rhizome17
What, as opposed to Fox having a story that wasn't even meant to be a story? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I think you are confusing that with the CBS story that was completely fraudulent... Big difference between making up a story using forged documents that someone could go to jail with, and having some fun with a guy like Kerry who can't keep his ideas straight.


:rolleyes:


Where were you on that one Mr "I only want the facts"? Liberal la la land?
 
R

rhizome17

Fan Favourite
Originally posted by Elder
I think you are confusing that with the CBS story that was completely fraudulent... Big difference between making up a story using forged documents that someone could go to jail with, and having some fun with a guy like Kerry who can't keep his ideas straight.


:rolleyes:


Where were you on that one Mr "I only want the facts"? Liberal la la land?
Click to expand...

Oh no, I am certainly not confused about a news agency that is so oncompetent that it can't even distinguish what is meant to be a story and what isn''t.

And if you had actually been paying attention, you would notice I didn't even enter the debate you guys were having about the candidates and military rcords, because I don't actually care about who served where, when and how. At the end of the day, one of them served in Vietnam, the other did. Big effing deal. This is 2004, not 1973.
 
B

Brondbyfan

Senior Squad
I think you've got it backwards. CBS was a case of insufficient fact-checking, although they did do some of it. It was not "completely fraudulent." "Completely fraudulent" would be just plain making something up and publishing it. Which is what FOX did. You're such a relativist. What CBS did was part of a vast leftist conspiracy, but when FOX posts anti-Kerry idiocy from, and this is the crucial point, the guy assigned to the Kerry campaign, it's "having some fun." But then again, the torture of detainees in Iraq was just "blowing off some steam," right Rush? I also like how you get a throw-away comment about Kerry "not keeping his facts straight" in there. That's not even what the FOX anti-Kerry thing was about, it was calling him effeminate or gay.
 
R

rhizome17

Fan Favourite
Anyway, the only people in lala land are the ones who ever believed anything that came out of Bush's mouth regarding Iraq. Every single justification unravels as soon as it is uttered.
 
E

Elder

Starting XI
Originally posted by Brondbyfan
I think you've got it backwards. CBS was a case of insufficient fact-checking, although they did do some of it. It was not "completely fraudulent." "Completely fraudulent" would be just plain making something up and publishing it. Which is what FOX did. You're such a relativist. What CBS did was part of a vast leftist conspiracy, but when FOX posts anti-Kerry idiocy from, and this is the crucial point, the guy assigned to the Kerry campaign, it's "having some fun." But then again, the torture of detainees in Iraq was just "blowing off some steam," right Rush? I also like how you get a throw-away comment about Kerry "not keeping his facts straight" in there. That's not even what the FOX anti-Kerry thing was about, it was calling him effeminate or gay.
Click to expand...

Insufficient fact checking? What are you smoking? The people who checked the facts weren't comfortable with CBS running the story, but they did anyway. The story was based on certain documents that WERE FORGED USING MICROSOFT WORD. That's called a fraudulent story. I know you are a liberal blowhard, but you should be able to admit that by now. Oh wait, you are the guy who never admits he is wrong... so typical of the "we are smarter than everyone else" left wing.

Also, is it not allowed to have some fun while working? If he did it against Bush I bet you would laugh. I challenge you to find any bias in Carl Cameron's actual reporting on the campaign trail... You won't because Fox, in it's news coverage, goes both ways and actually does present both sides to a story. I'm sorry you haven't realized that yet either, but I bet you don't watch Fox in the first place. You're probably a PBS fan. Anyway, my challenge stands.

I don't know why you bring up Rush. He's not a news organization.
 
E

Elder

Starting XI
Originally posted by rhizome17
Oh no, I am certainly not confused about a news agency that is so oncompetent that it can't even distinguish what is meant to be a story and what isn''t.

And if you had actually been paying attention, you would notice I didn't even enter the debate you guys were having about the candidates and military rcords, because I don't actually care about who served where, when and how. At the end of the day, one of them served in Vietnam, the other did. Big effing deal. This is 2004, not 1973.
Click to expand...

The story is about a major news organization using forged documents in a news story... not whether or not someone was doing something in the military back in 1973.

Silly boy.
 
L

Lean

Fan Favourite
Originally posted by Elder
Can't believe Brazil is still a poor country who's citizens flock to the US.

;)
Click to expand...

Better than defending Bush, dickhead. Go sleep thinking Lula is a communist btw. Duh. Also, half of our population hates USA, if you want to know.

Pay us a visit sometime and try to speak English to see what you'll get.
 
E

Elder

Starting XI
Originally posted by Grunger
Better than defending Bush, dickhead. Go sleep thinking Lula is a communist btw. Duh. Also, half of our population hates USA, if you want to know.

Pay us a visit sometime and try to speak English to see what you'll get.
Click to expand...

No thanks, I'd rather have people speaking your language cleaning my house. What time is our appointment?


:crazyboy:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.


Top