• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

Should Saddam Hussein be executed?

Rob

Mourinho’s Assistant
Yes or no?

Firstly this is the crimes he is accused of .. and is most likely to be found guilty for.

- Responsible directly for the death of 2million people.
- 340,000 Iraqis and 730,000 Iranians killed during the Iran-Iraq War
- Use of chemical weapons during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s.
- Repeated use of chemical weapons by Iraq against the Kurds.
- Ethnic cleansing of Iraq?s southern Shiites.
- Summary executions of thousands of political opponents.
- Torture of political detainees.
- War crimes committed during and following the invasion of Kuwait in 1990 and 1991 on US and British forces
- 1000 Kuwaiti nationals killed following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait
- Approximately 500,000 Iraqi children dead because of international trade sanctions introduced following the Gulf War.
- Over 100,000 Kurds killed or "disappeared"
- 100,000 Shi?ite Muslims killed under his reign and mass graves found by US troops
- Guilty of allowing Iraqi Troops of mistreating, torturing or executing American prisoners of war (POWs), posing as civilians, using non-combatants as human shields, and faking surrenders.


Saddam could face more than one trial , international lawyers say. Just as in the United States, where a criminal can be tried for different offences in separate jurisdictions, he could face additional trials in countries that accuse him of war crimes against their people. This includes Kuwait, Iran, and the United States. The likelihood of these secondary trials occurring remains unknown. Given that the Iraqi court is permitted to impose the death penalty, additional trials may be unrealistic.

If not already given the death penalty Saddam will face trials in a military court for war crimes against the United States under the 1949 Geneva Conventions. He is guilty of mistreating, torturing or executing American prisoners of war (POWs), posing as civilians, using non-combatants as human shields, and faking surrenders. The United States may also attempt to prosecute Iraqi officials for war crimes committed against U.S. forces in the 1991 Gulf War, officials said.

For a regime that was giving the death penalty to anybody who deserted the army for four or five days, it would be outrageous if they were to give Saddam Hussein a life sentence. That just wouldn't drive in Iraq forward towards rebuilding. It?s very symbolic.

Saddam most likely will not be trailed under American, Iraqi or UN Law, but under the 1949 Geneva Conventions, which permits the death penalty.

Most likely will be tried for
Genocide
Crimes against humanity
War crimes
Violations of specific Iraqi laws, including: the attempt to manipulate judges, the squandering of public assets and funds, and ?the threat of war or use of the armed forces of Iraq against an Arab country??a crime in Iraq since 1958.

How does the Iraqi tribunal define genocide?
It applies the same definition used by the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide adopted by the United Nations after the mass killings of World War II. Genocide consists of acts?including murder, serious harm, starvation, and forced displacement?undertaken ?with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group.?

------

I think he must be trialled by Iraqi's for the Iraqi people and I am for the death penalty. I am not condoning the death penalty but I think this is under extreme circumstances.

This is a quote from another forum
I think Saddam poses a sufficient threat as long as he
lives to warrant execution, and I wouldn't want to risk antagonizing
the Iraqi people by blocking their likely desire to mete out final
justice on their tormentor.


Not only that if he is sentenced to life where will he be imprisoned? In Iraq? Can we guarantee that security is at the absolute highest? What if Saddam supporters lead an uprising to free him or you have a situation where they take hostages on a plane or something unless Saddam is let go. I do not want to run this risk. I think the end of Saddam is a driving force for freedom and democracy for Iraq.

I think any man that hurts children should be shot, let alone killing children. He would eye-gauge children so the parents would speak. A brutal man should be put to peace.
 

Seb

Banned : [Racism and child pornography]
Life Ban
No, hes doing no harm, where he is now and if he is executed it would lead to all sorts of trouble
 

Bobby

The Legend
Re: Should Saddam Hussein be executed?

Originally posted by Rob

I think any man that hurts children should be shot, let alone killing children. He would eye-gauge children so the parents would speak. A brutal man should be put to peace.

What a dick. :kader:

Yea, he should be put to death. He's killed alot of people in his day and ruined alot of lives.

Hell, he should be beat to death, the other stuff is too good for him.
 

Alistair

Starting XI
The death penalty is hippocracy in my opinion.. Killing someone for murder or whatever is just as bad as what they did themselves.. even if they killed 2,000,000 people or whatever it still doesn't justify killing them..
 

ShiftyPowers

Make America Great Again
No he shouldn't. He also shouldn't be tried in Iraq; seriously, that's the dumbest **** ever. Anyone ever hear of the International Court? George Bush? No? Well, that's the court that is especially designed for war crimes and genocide that dethroned leaders are accused of. Oh, but if he gets tried in The Hague then I guess he probably would tell everyone about his long relationship with the Bushes and Rumsfeld that might as well have been a gay love affair before the Gulf War.
 

PhiLLer

Fan Favourite
He should be tried in The Hague at the war tribunal but defenitely shouldn't be executed, just life imprisonment, that's much worse to people like him. Killing him would just spark another backlash.
 

RVN

Banned
Life Ban
Originally posted by PhiLLer
He should be tried in The Hague at the war tribunal but defenitely shouldn't be executed, just life imprisonment, that's much worse to people like him. Killing him would just spark another backlash.

i agree but he would be probably killed in prison any way by other inmates
 

mhflierman

Starting XI
Not ANYONE on this planet should be allowed the power to take another man's life. Not even the life of Saddam Hussein. So NO.

We've got treaties concerning International Law. They're not there for nothing. I know the US likes to ignore that now and then, but that's not how it works. The Hague is the place where Saddam should be judged.
 

Rob

Mourinho’s Assistant
Thanks for the input. I have a debate on Tuesday and I am on the Yes side. I know what I may have to rebut so thanks :) :(Y)

Anyone got some creditable arguements for his death? Please? :)
 
tbh..... i think the numbers have been exaggerated a bit :rolleyes:

if he deserves the death penalty then so does quite a line of american leaders and higher-up ranked ppls over the years :rolleyes:

but yea... locked up somewhere for his life sounds good.... :kader:
 

rpvankasteren

Fan Favourite
Originally posted by ShiftyPowers
No he shouldn't. He also shouldn't be tried in Iraq; seriously, that's the dumbest **** ever. Anyone ever hear of the International Court? George Bush? No? Well, that's the court that is especially designed for war crimes and genocide that dethroned leaders are accused of. Oh, but if he gets tried in The Hague then I guess he probably would tell everyone about his long relationship with the Bushes and Rumsfeld that might as well have been a gay love affair before the Gulf War.

I don't think the US government acknowledges the International Court. They stated a year and a half ago they would invade Holland if a US citizen was ever to be tried there (to get the citizen out of court, of course, not to take over the country).
Them letting Saddam be tried there would kick Bush in the face.
 

Andrew

Banned : [Racism]
Life Ban
I think he should be put into a little 10 x 10 ft room, and left to think about the **** he has done to the iraqi people. He should be given a slice of bread a day and no toilet. This way he will rot...
 

Spurs4Life

Starting XI
Killing him is a cowards way out for him. He would die a marta and instead of him living in a hard jail for 10 years atleast he would die a quick easy death, let him live and suffer.
 

panxoman

Senior Squad
Originally posted by Andrew
I think he should be put into a little 10 x 10 ft room, and left to think about the **** he has done to the iraqi people. He should be given a slice of bread a day and no toilet. This way he will rot...

I agree.

He shouldn't be killed, but on the other hand, some prisions are like hotels. Have you seen any images of Milosevich 's room? his live is much easier and better than some of the people that got their lives ruined by them ... That's a shame.

Put Milosevich, Sharon, Saddam, bin ladden, Bush ... in a dirty hole and throw them rubbish. Let's see how long can they survive.
 


Top