• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

Last movie you watched

$teauA

Superstar
go watch the movie again.....your recollection of certain key incidents is way off! The cops see them, they see cops, cops start shooting at them when they attempt to get away, then they hide behind some boulders, cops continue to shoot (attempting to kill em imo), older brother stupidly gets up, gets shot, younger brother picks up gun and then proceeds to shoot back to defend his father and brother.....all the while they're begging the cops to stop shooting, but no one's listening. Dude.....a sacred cow (A White person....and a woman at that) had been shot.....there's no way those cops were gonna let em see any form of proper justice.....they wanted to off em right there and then and bury their asses up on those mountains.

Well yes cops have been known to shoot after people when they are running away from the law, unless of course that is to be expected in Moroccan culture, you should know you seem to be an expert in the subject.


sheesh.....could you come off this anti-gun rhetoric for just a second? It's clouding your views considerably. Guns are very common in that culture, especially as it pertains to rural, village folk and their shepherd boys. These kids (in those sorts of environments) are taught to handle and shoot guns for protection, sport and hunting at around the ages that the kids in the movie were portrayed.....preteenish to early teens. How can you conclude and make the judgement that the father was an immoral and vile human being just because he engaged his sons in a sort of rite of passage into manhood by equipping them with a gun for security and the defence of their sheep? Did he instruct them to shoot the gun carelessly at anything that came into their sight? Clearly not. You're just doggedly clinging on to their age when it's evident that there's probably lots of kids out there in that culture who get guns at around the same age who don't even try to shoot at an inanimate object let alone a human being.........these kids just so happened to have made a stupid mistake, man.

And people wonder why some cultures are so incredibly f*cked up...


You're being unreasonable and deliberately thickheaded, man. Either you don't know much about that culture and their way of life, or you're just continuing on with this charade just for the fun of it. It's the boys' duty to tend to the herding of the livestock....YES, EVEN AS YOUNG AS EIGHT or so, alright? Secondly, the mother and the daughter most likely have other womanly roles set by their cultures that they have to take care of. You can't be expecting them to be dealing with the domestic matters such as taking care of the toddlers, laundry, cooking, cleaning and all sorts of other **** and then go out and herd hundreds of stock all over that expansive and rugged land, man. These boys were well within the age of being able to responsibly tend to the family's stock. it's easy to defend the father's decision to purchase that gun because their isolated circumstance necessitates that they protect both themselves and their edible beasts as best as can be done......you have to remember that the father was away on a trip to the city on the day that this incident occurred....normally, I suspect that he'd be checking up on them from time to time to see that they were not slacking off and ****.

And you aren't :D?


boy are you an angry and hostile sonofabitch.....I should've known better than to start up a civil debate with someone whose original reply was so adamant and perversely rigid.....this movie seems to have struck a chord with you in the most negative of ways, man.....I can't help it if you didn't connect with any of the characters or the issues surrounding the movie

Not really...it's just that the movie isn't nearly the level of quality that you make it seem to be.


again, it was one or two individuals who were behaving in that manner....the rest of em were only following along....just because no one did (in their warped and panicked minds) them any harm at that moment doesn't mean that there wasn't a potential for it to happen the longer they lingered on in that nondescript village

Oh so that gave them reason to go to the husband with the dying wife and say "f*ck you we're leaving"?


GOOD GOD! I'm trying my best to refrain from personal attacks here, man, but you're mercilessly baiting me with your pointless and misguided replies.

Oh don't refrain to those, they correlate directly to a weak character and I'm sure you done have one of those.


Sir Sir_Didier_Drogba;2387778 said:
Wow, I thought I was the only person that could be bothered to argue with Yossarian.

For the record, I found Babel to be hugely disappointing, but I've probably said this already somewhere.

Haha (H)(Y)
 

RuiCosta_10

Starting XI
Godfather Part II, better than the first in my opinion, which is also brilliant. Loved the flashbacks showing the beginning of Vito's Corleone career and life, and that was probably why i like it better than the first. The plot is also very good, the acting is amazing, i'm obviously going to mention Robert De Niro and Al Pacino that were absolutely incredible. The soundtrack goes pretty well with the movie and i don't think the fact that the movie is quite long and has some death moments makes it boring, actually those moments are amazing, like the stare Michael Corleone does threatening the hell out of everybody, and those conversations in the waiting room... Definitely one of the best movies i ever saw. Now gotta rent the third.
 

$teauA

Superstar
RuiCosta_10;2387973 said:
Godfather Part II, better than the first in my opinion, which is also brilliant. Loved the flashbacks showing the beginning of Vito's Corleone career and life, and that was probably why i like it better than the first. The plot is also very good, the acting is amazing, i'm obviously going to mention Robert De Niro and Al Pacino that were absolutely incredible. The soundtrack goes pretty well with the movie and i don't think the fact that the movie is quite long and has some death moments makes it boring, actually those moments are amazing, like the stare Michael Corleone does threatening the hell out of everybody, and those conversations in the waiting room... Definitely one of the best movies i ever saw. Now gotta rent the third.

I agree 100% with everything you said (Y)
 

Yossarian

Fan Favourite
Well yes cops have been known to shoot after people when they are running away from the law, unless of course that is to be expected in Moroccan culture, you should know you seem to be an expert in the subject.


resorting to feeble sarcastic responses as a means of beefing up your otherwise nonsensical and pointless jibber-jabber is pathetic.......keep at it because your desperation and futility is only becoming more blatantly obvious with each reply.


I've done my best in debating our points of contention in an easy going and reasonable fashion for the longest time, but you on the other hand have realized quite the opposite in miscomprehending and misrepresenting both mine and your arguments, getting all muddled up and more absurd from the second reply on forward.


And people wonder why some cultures are so incredibly f*cked up...


right..... just because they want to be self-reliant and preserve their stock, they're ****ed up pieces of scum? Your intolerant, ill-informed and seriously dogmatized views are way more loathesome and disturbing than the idea that some otherwise decent folk in some little hamlet equip their young boys with the tools necessary in their environment to keep afloat and persevere.


And you aren't ?


Not that im not capable of it, because we all are, but I haven't once displayed such moronic ploys to continue to prolong and pump up an otherwise lifeless argument and make perversely insensitive comments in order to bait you into a redundant needless dispute, as you have almost from the start.


Not really...it's just that the movie isn't nearly the level of quality that you make it seem to be.


and it's not nearly as terrible as you seem to think it was either.......I, for one, am not the individual with the foggy and messy memory of some of the most important segments of the flick.


Oh so that gave them reason to go to the husband with the dying wife and say "f*ck you we're leaving"?


I've already answered this to a sickening degree, pretty much like all of your other inane and ridiculously repetitive queries and retorts, alright? I'm only speculating from a devil's advocate viewpoint.....I've long ago conceded that it was a brutally heartless and shockingly cruel way for them to react to such a precarious circumstance.....and also slightly improbable.


Oh don't refrain to those, they correlate directly to a weak character and I'm sure you done have one of those.


heh.......I'm not always infallible and without any traces of character defects, but your consistent goading, provocations and petty needlings can be from time to time impossible to ignore.......oh yeah, why don't you go **** yourself, you worthless son of a c/unt..........there.......that needed to be let out, man.
 

$teauA

Superstar
resorting to feeble sarcastic responses as a means of beefing up your otherwise nonsensical and pointless jibber-jabber is pathetic.......keep at it because your desperation and futility is only becoming more blatantly obvious with each reply.

I'm gonna go ahead and take that you agreed with my point which is why you completely ignored it (Y)

right..... just because they want to be self-reliant and preserve their stock, they're ****ed up pieces of scum? Your intolerant, ill-informed and seriously dogmatized views are way more loathesome and disturbing than the idea that some otherwise decent folk in some little hamlet equip their young boys with the tools necessary in their environment to keep afloat and persevere.

I'm just saying dude, if in certain cultures it is normal for children to walk around with guns from such a young age there's a higher likelihood that incidents will occur. I don't care if they are African, American, European, Asian or whatever kids, if you let kids walk around with guns, no matter how normal that is for their culture, incidents will happen. After all the movie is trying to portray an anti-gun view so I'm beginning to wonder why you're fighting against that so much when you keep talking about how impressive this movie was.


Not that im not capable of it, because we all are, but I haven't once displayed such moronic ploys to continue to prolong and pump up an otherwise lifeless argument and make perversely insensitive comments in order to bait you into a redundant needless dispute, as you have almost from the start.

I don't know about you but I was ready to stop like 3 posts ago so I don't know out of the two of us which one is guilty for displaying moronic ploys to continue to prolong and pump up and otherwise lifeless argument and make perversely insensitive comments in order to bait you into a redundant needless dispute.


and it's not nearly as terrible as you seem to think it was either.......I, for one, am not the individual with the foggy and messy memory of some of the most important segments of the flick.

You just recently saw the film, I saw it when it came out on DVD.

I've already answered this to a sickening degree, pretty much like all of your other inane and ridiculously repetitive queries and retorts, alright? I'm only speculating from a devil's advocate viewpoint.....I've long ago conceded that it was a brutally heartless and shockingly cruel way for them to react to such a precarious circumstance.....and also slightly improbable.

Glad we've got that all settled (Y).


heh.......I'm not always infallible and without any traces of character defects, but your consistent goading, provocations and petty needlings can be from time to time impossible to ignore.......oh yeah, why don't you go **** yourself, you worthless son of a c/unt..........there.......that needed to be let out, man.

:evil:
 

Tom

That Nice Guy
Knocked Up
Surprisingly good, overlong but consistenyly funny throughout. Something certainly unusual about this film, at times it becomes nothing more than an American Pie rehash but more than often it draws you back in with laugh-out-loud humour. Very funny film, recommend anyone to watch it.

I hope to god it's classified as an 18 though, because it really should be.
 

Yossarian

Fan Favourite
I'm gonna go ahead and take that you agreed with my point which is why you completely ignored it


I don't think that I did.....I addressed it.....well, as best as can be done with such an unintelligible response, Look, you've been deceptively and cowardly dodging most of my replies from the beginning, so it becomes tedious very quickly when you realize that the person you're debating with is evading the main points of your argument and being dishonest.


I'm just saying dude, if in certain cultures it is normal for children to walk around with guns from such a young age there's a higher likelihood that incidents will occur. I don't care if they are African, American, European, Asian or whatever kids, if you let kids walk around with guns, no matter how normal that is for their culture, incidents will happen. After all the movie is trying to portray an anti-gun view so I'm beginning to wonder why you're fighting against that so much when you keep talking about how impressive this movie was.


You're discounting that this is a minority group in very remote parts of the country that still hold to this way of life, and as a result you're making very irrational and inflamed generalizations as a whole. They're a subculture of the main community at large so it's not as though every kid in that society including those in bigger communities and more populous cities carries a gun around 24/7 as an extension of their arm or something.......just because a movie that I enjoyed immensely has a certain take on an issue that I may not happen to agree with doesn't mean that I have to automatically assume and acquire its beliefs and inflexible convictions.


This correlation that gun ownership equals more crime and general violence is an inaccurate and highly misleading one, man. This erroneous belief by rabid anti-gun folk that guns in the hands of private owners will still lead to increased rates in the crime statistics has been disproven in the academic world countlessly......and that's most likely even more true and evident in rural settings.


I don't know about you but I was ready to stop like 3 posts ago so I don't know out of the two of us which one is guilty for displaying moronic ploys to continue to prolong and pump up and otherwise lifeless argument and make perversely insensitive comments in order to bait you into a redundant needless dispute.


lol.....BULL****!. You've even yourself said that you wouldn't stop this exercise in arguing just for the sake of arguing if I didn't do it myself first......meaning that you'd keep up with this pretense even if you didn't have anything relevant and worthy of being posted left..now how does that correspond with your willingness and want to concede and end this anger filled dispute?


You just recently saw the film, I saw it when it came out on DVD.


and why is this outrageously obvious statement necessary? I saw it when it first came out and saw it again recently mainly for the express reason of making a post about it on here while it was still fresh and clear in my head. You on the other hand have completely sworn off ever watching it again.....if you were looking for a civil and honest debate, you would've atleast made the effort of watching it again after not having seen it for quite a while.....atleast to have yer **** straight.


Glad we've got that all settled .


are you being sincere?........because if you are, then cool.
 

Yossarian

Fan Favourite
^^ surviving puberty made me a fierce internet warrior.......grrrr.....grrrr.....grrrrr.....I carry the weight of a generation on my shoulders from my computer console, man....not unlike Bob Dylan circa '63-65.......grrrrr.....grrrrr.....grrrrr!



hurhurhur......
 

Mandieta6

Red Card - Life
Life Ban
You wanna bang two different women? :O What are you trying to do? Impress us with your attraction to women?

It's working. :(
 
S

Sir Calumn

Guest
Laura.... decent early noir from Otto Preminger... a little unrealistic in some elements, but a great portrait of human emotion and obsession. Great early (and highly quotable) performance from Vincent Price, also. Generally regarded as one of the all time great noirs, I'm not sure I'd rate it that highly, but it's definately a film you should see. I'm warming more and more to Dana Andrews and Gene Tierney, thanks to their performances under Preminger.
 

Tom

That Nice Guy
Red Sonja
Not seen it since i was about ten, jumping jesus it's a bad movie. Maybe not QUITE on the same level of badness as something such as Dungeons and Dragans or Taxi, but very very nearly. The kid is annoying, the comedy side-kick is annoying and Sonja... well, i've no idea what nationality she is. Only Arnie makes it watchable for the laughs.

The acting, throughout, and from everyone, is nothing short of diabolical.

But still, entertaining for kids i guess.
 

Deisler

Red Card [Being a douche] exp. 22/1/06
BLOODLINE
Niga's great piece of art man (yossarian accent) (H)
Seriosly i didn't excpect this flick to be so entertaining and well done. The storyline was great and the choisse of actors was great too. You guys should consider watching it.
 


Top