• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

CONCACAF and the CONMEBOL

Lennon

Wants to be a Superstar
ShiftyPowers said:
I didn't realize geography was so poor in some countries. North America and South America are seperate continents. How do I know? TECTONIC PLATES!!



You have to be a complete moron to advocate that North and South America are the same Continent. Just like you'd have to be an idiot to say Australia is not a continent. Just look at the geography.

A bigger concern would be "why are Isreal, Turkey, and Asian Soviet Republics in UEFA"?

In fact, according to the georgraphy, you should be more concerned with merging UEFA and AFC, but you're not saying that are you? Because you don't know what you're talking about and are advocating an artificial and baseless position.

You're wrong.

If we go by your plates 'theory' Europe and Asia are one continent and India is a continent by itself basically. Heck even the tiny Isla de Pascuas in the Pacific is a continent by itself too then (since it's located in the Nazca plate) :funny:

All in all, nobody is 'right'. In South America and several countries in Europe it is taught that America is one continent. Here in the U.S. it's different.

The perfect example can be found in the Spanish wikipedia: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/América (you don't need to understand spanish, just look at the map)

English wikipedia also mentions America as a big mass of land with 'subdivisions'
the Americas, the lands and regions of the Western hemisphere, usually subdivided into North America and South America
 

Num Lock

Reserve Team
Kibe Kru said:
From a different perspective, would Argentina and Brazil like to play against Barbados and St. Kittis to qualify?

they wouldn't mind, after all you guys play teams like venezuela during your qualifiers....
 

Kibe Kru

Starting XI
Num Lock said:
they wouldn't mind, after all you guys play teams like venezuela during your qualifiers....
Venezuela is not as bad as some people think. Also, it's not that far, and they have hot women.
 

Num Lock

Reserve Team
BolsoDecano1899 said:
dumb idea,
1) argentina, brazil, uruguay, and chile would never agree to travel 9+ hours just to play against jamaica, panama, costa rica, trinidad and tobago, etc, etc. not only that but players in europe would refuse to travel 9+ hours from europe to south america and then another 9+ hours to play the match, its rediculous.

their players have to travel +9 hours from europe, might as well travel directly to the country that they gonna play their wqc, right now some of 'em sometimes do that. you do know how many hours is it from italy to say argentina right?


2) alot of South american countries and all north american countries (except usa and mexico) wouldn't be able to afford it. (welcome to the 3rd world)

i don't think they are that poor dude

3) countries like costa rica, tnt, etc, etc would never qualify to a world cup again, mexico and usa would have a very hard time qualifying.

exactly

4) even if you would have to qualify to the copa america to get in, they will still send in their "B" teams.

don't think so, it would be a shame for the big teams to not be able qualify cuz they thought their b team was good enough.
 

Num Lock

Reserve Team
Kibe Kru said:
Venezuela is not as bad as some people think. Also, it's not that far, and they have hot women.


maybe, but i don't see 'em winning against brazil or argentina any time soon.
 

$teauA

Superstar
WC qualifying works the way it is right now, no need for change.

One thing that I would like to see would be the Copa America involve both the CONMEBOL and CONCACAF and have some sort of qualifying round. It would become sort of like the Americas EURO.
 

Kibe Kru

Starting XI
Num Lock said:
maybe, but i don't see 'em winning against brazil or argentina any time soon.
31.03-04
Montevideo

URUGUAY 0-3 VENEZUELA

G.Urdaneta 18
H.Gonzalez 62
J.Arango 77

A few years before that, it'd be unthinkable.

Also, you have to question some countries' willingness to pay quite a lot of money to travel to Buenos Aires to play against Argentina.
 

D1gooid

Senior Squad
Num Lock said:
they will eventually, and they will be better for it.

Well, how many spots they'll have there? like 10, then? Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay, Ecuador, Paraguay, Colombia and even Mexico own USA. Seriously.
 
D1gooid said:
If they merge, USA will never play a WC again... :( that's why, actually.
:rolleyes:
BolsoDecano1899 said:
3) countries like costa rica, tnt, etc, etc would never qualify to a world cup again, mexico and usa would have a very hard time qualifying.
Mexico and USA would not have a hard time qualifying.

4.5 spots + 3.5 spots = 8 spots

Basically, USA and Mexico would have to do better than the likes of Peru and Bolivia. Not a terrible challenge.
 
D1gooid said:
Well, how many spots they'll have there? like 10, then? Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay, Ecuador, Paraguay, Colombia and even Mexico own USA. Seriously.
Funniest. Post. Of. The. Year.

Have you been in a coma for the past 16 years?
 
USA vs. Mexico and South American teams other than Brazil and Argentina over the past 4 years:

2002: USA 1-0 Ecuador
2002: USA 1-0 Mexico
2002: USA 2-1 Uruguay
2002: USA 2-0 Mexico
2003: USA 2-0 Venezuela
2003: USA 0-0 Mexico
2003: USA 2-0 Paraguay
2004: USA 1-0 Mexico
2005: USA 3-0 Colombia
2005: Mexico 2-1 USA
2005: USA 2-0 Mexico
2006: USA 2-0 Venezuela

Total record:

10 wins
1 draw
1 loss


Yes, they really "own" us, don't they? :rolleyes:
 

Num Lock

Reserve Team
Run DMB said:
USA vs. Mexico and South American teams other than Brazil and Argentina over the past 4 years:

2002: USA 1-0 Ecuador
2002: USA 1-0 Mexico
2002: USA 2-1 Uruguay
2002: USA 2-0 Mexico
2003: USA 2-0 Venezuela
2003: USA 0-0 Mexico
2003: USA 2-0 Paraguay
2004: USA 1-0 Mexico
2005: USA 3-0 Colombia
2005: Mexico 2-1 USA
2005: USA 2-0 Mexico
2006: USA 2-0 Venezuela

Total record:

10 wins
1 draw
1 loss


Yes, they really "own" us, don't they? :rolleyes:

haha yeah that's nice, records from friendlies and copa america invitations against b squads.
 
Num Lock said:
haha yeah that's nice, records from friendlies and copa america invitations against b squads.
:boohoo:

The US used an all-MLS squad for a number of those games, which is essentially a B-team. Nice try, though.

It must be pretty sobering, being confronted with the truth.
 

#1 Stunna

The Alpha Mexican
Num Lock said:
haha yeah that's nice, records from friendlies and copa america invitations against b squads.

As opposed to your assumptions that you base from a few games and your opinion. But like Shifty said, it wouldnt be that hard for Mexico and USA to beat Bolivia, Peru, Venezuela, Ecuador, etc. Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay would present some challenge, but with 8.5 spots... we're still in.
 

Num Lock

Reserve Team
Run DMB said:
:boohoo:

The US used an all-MLS squad for a number of those games, which is essentially a B-team. Nice try, though.


like i said a few posts back your team is on the big stage with a chance to prove me and history wrong, you are the ones who actually need to make a nice try though.
 
Num Lock said:
like i said a few posts back your team is on the big stage with a chance to prove me and history wrong, you are the ones who actually need to make a nice try though.
The ones who have something to prove are Ecuador, Paraguay, Uruguay and Colombia.

USA and Mexico have reached the quarterfinals of a World Cup in the last 20 years. Those teams haven't.
 

Num Lock

Reserve Team
skiptomylou said:
They did that in '02, where you born in the past three years?


i still don't get why some of you feel the need to resort to insults, anyway

it's ok, i guess. good luck with reapeting the '02 feat, contrary to what you may think i actually want you to repeat it or improve upon it.
 


Top