Bluecoaster
Reserve Team
Larsp has come up with some shocking facts:
"I collected data from 109 games to investigate the effects of the attribute passing. The data were from a number of different teams. These are the results, depending on number of balls in Pa:
0: 205 off 302 (68%)
1: 371 off 658 (56%)
2: 916 off 1458 (63%)
3: 1715 off 2660 (64%)
4: 1482 off 2290 (65%)
5: 1176 off 1821 (65%)
6: 675 off 1063 (64%)
7: 540 off 765 (71%)
8: 105 off 160 (65%)
The values for players with 3 and 7 balls are a little deviant. The chance to succeed with a pass for a player from 2 to 6 balls in Pa is extremely stable, 63% to 64%.
I would not spend one cent on more balls in passing, based on this."
Also, just like this one, another research was done on tackling balls and their effect. The end result will sure help lot of managers in the training and tactics.
When analysing the tackling, I get the following result. The total number of attempts in my database was 6565, and the number of successes was 2169, giving an average success rate of 33%.
Using korrelation analysis, I found that this chance depends on the attribute Ta as well as Fo.
The dependency on Ta is very clear. Every ball in Ta increases the chance to succeed with 4.5% (in average).
Every ball in Form increases the chance with 1.2%.
A player with 0 in both Ta and Fo will have 7.8% chance.
The final formula for the chance to succeed with a tackling is:
7.8% + 4.5% * Ta + 1.2% * Fo
I could find no measurable dependencies from the other attributes. It is a little disappointing that the player experience doesn't do anything for tackling or passing. And not for shooting either.
For those interested in the regression statistics:
R square is 71%
t quotient for the offset is 2.3
t quotient for he Fo coefficient is 3.7
t quotient for the Ta coefficient is 10.8
Thank you larsp for this information
Blue
P.S Larsp is also doing a research on shooting.
"I collected data from 109 games to investigate the effects of the attribute passing. The data were from a number of different teams. These are the results, depending on number of balls in Pa:
0: 205 off 302 (68%)
1: 371 off 658 (56%)
2: 916 off 1458 (63%)
3: 1715 off 2660 (64%)
4: 1482 off 2290 (65%)
5: 1176 off 1821 (65%)
6: 675 off 1063 (64%)
7: 540 off 765 (71%)
8: 105 off 160 (65%)
The values for players with 3 and 7 balls are a little deviant. The chance to succeed with a pass for a player from 2 to 6 balls in Pa is extremely stable, 63% to 64%.
I would not spend one cent on more balls in passing, based on this."
Also, just like this one, another research was done on tackling balls and their effect. The end result will sure help lot of managers in the training and tactics.
When analysing the tackling, I get the following result. The total number of attempts in my database was 6565, and the number of successes was 2169, giving an average success rate of 33%.
Using korrelation analysis, I found that this chance depends on the attribute Ta as well as Fo.
The dependency on Ta is very clear. Every ball in Ta increases the chance to succeed with 4.5% (in average).
Every ball in Form increases the chance with 1.2%.
A player with 0 in both Ta and Fo will have 7.8% chance.
The final formula for the chance to succeed with a tackling is:
7.8% + 4.5% * Ta + 1.2% * Fo
I could find no measurable dependencies from the other attributes. It is a little disappointing that the player experience doesn't do anything for tackling or passing. And not for shooting either.
For those interested in the regression statistics:
R square is 71%
t quotient for the offset is 2.3
t quotient for he Fo coefficient is 3.7
t quotient for the Ta coefficient is 10.8
Thank you larsp for this information
Blue
P.S Larsp is also doing a research on shooting.