This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
Yossarian;2468288 said:don't they have something like a 9-1 road record so far this season? I think that the kid's got a legitimate case.....I mean, it sucks that their defence is crippled by all those injuries, but I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if they not only cover whatever the spread is for next week, but also win it outright.
(8) San Dieego SUPER CHARGERS...San Dieego SUPER CHARGERS!!! (8)Yossarian;2468239 said:The SUPER CHARGERS!!
ShiftyPowers;2468927 said:First of all, that's a fluke. Secondly, with Brett Favre playing like he is, the forecast calling for 11 degrees Fahrenheit as the high, Eli playing in the cold against arguably the best defense in the league, and the Lambeau crowd as probably the most knowledgeable and most faithful in all of sports, there is no chance for the Giants. I don't know if they'll cover, but they will not win. Eli is going to look like Peyton at Foxborough on Sunday, and anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional.
Yossarian;2470373 said:Well, you can make a case for them having a weak-ass sched, but to call their remarkable away record a "Fluke" is I think just unfair and wrong. Also, I realize that East Rutherford ain't like the Tundra of GB in the dead of winter, but it also ain't no San Diego or nothing, bro, so this supposed weather advantage is rather misleading and needs to be put to a rest already because the Giants consistently play in bitter, frigid weather also.......I'm not delusional. Of course Lambeau is an enormous home field advantage, it's just that after having watched the Giants last 4-5 games, I'm really optimistic about this squad, man. Everyone that I've been hearing about is saying that GB is gonna role them. Role them like they did to the Seaturds, and I'm not buying that, man. The Seaturds have always been a horrendous team playing away from home in the playoffs, and they didn't seem to adjust to the playing surface after the snow came pouring down, which led them to overrun a lot of plays and miss otherwise easy tackles.......anyway. My heart's definitely with the Packers, but my money's on the Giants to cover.....or maybe the over? I was expecting the spread to be more than a touchdown to be honest....more like 10 or something......hmmm
ShiftyPowers;2471063 said:Dude, the Packers dropped 35 on the Giants in week 2 in the Medowlands. Since then we have actually started to run the ball. The Packers have allowed the least sacks of anyone this year, and last week Pro Bowler Patrick Kearney was turned into a spectator by our right tackle Mark Taucher. Chad Clifton will do the same thing to Osi. Don't you remember the last high profile game we had with the Giants, where Strahan was so neutralized in the last game of the season, that Brett took a dive to give Strahan his record breaking sack?
Yossarian;2471334 said:I see where you're coming from and I can't refute your reasoning as to why the Pack is gonna role in this one with any substantial evidence other than to say that the Giants are unbelievably hot and are flourishing just at the right time. You have to remember that they had one of the worst starts of any team this year, so that early game against the Pack isn't nearly indicative of where they are as a team right now, man.