KoreaJjang
Senior Squad
They(EA) rated all the lower division or not big leagues very poorly... Thats why EA pretty suck at ratings and stuff...
This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
Originally posted by CKA_Imparfait
In any case, no hard feelings. But do you want to cry about it or defend a point you made?
__________________
Are you 10 years old?
As for absurd accusations... Unless stating that Canada beat the US in Olympic Hockey for the gold is absurd, I don't recall "accusing" you of anything else.
I have a question. An honest question, not a veiled question, a simple question.
How many games a week do the players in the MLS play? I don't follow the MLS too closely, so I am not up to date on what types of tournements and such they participate in.
Thanks.
Originally posted by [mouta-FCP]
FC PORTO is for sure the most underrated team... 3,5 stars? Ridiculous, we won the UEFA CUP, the Portuguese Superleague, the Portuguese Cup, the Portuguese SuperCup and we lost unfairly the European Supercup. EA should look more to European Soccer, they only care by team names, no matter how the team are they always give great ratings to the "BIG" European Clubs... It's a shame. FC PORTO should have at least 4 stars, and if you see the ratings of the players it's laughable. Paulo Ferreira one of the best RB of Europe, R. Carvalho wanted by Real Madrid, Deco also wanted by Barcelona have stupid ratings.
Hmm i think 3.5 out of 5 is just right for Porto... if they had 4 or more stars then they would be among the best in the world which i don't think they are. and with all due respect, winning the UEFA cup still means that you're behind all other teams who played in the Champions League.
Originally posted by Broadside
If Australia is so freakin' awesome, don't you think FIFA would give Oceania ONE automatic place in the World Cup, perhaps?
==============================================
One answer - money. The US gets the soft route into the World Cup finals because FIFA is hoping to build the game there and tap one of the biggest markets in the world.
Australia is small fry....FIFA don't do them special favours so they make the finals. They are a good honest team. But soccer is still a minor sport in Oz, way behind Australian Rules football, Rugby Union and Rugby League.
UxSxAxfooty - as for the US beating Wales 2-0, big woop, we beat England 3-1 in February this year. Not saying we are better than England, but we do have some real class. Just not the same financial clout as the US, and money talks at FIFA.
Originally posted by Broadside
Oceania as a whole suck that is correct - there is no depth at all, for that reason Australia should be able to qualify for the WC finals through Asia rather than via South America
and if you think the US doesn't get it on a platter because of $$$ you are kidding yourself
why did the US host the WC finals a few years ago?
Australia v US???
Bring it on baby, Kewell will cut your defence to ribbons
You ought to win the Olympics, idiot, you invented the sport! I can't quite see how you can seriously have so much pride in hockey, though, when all of the Canadian franchises keep going bankrupt and moving to the States. For being so damned good, you'd think you could keep a quarter of the teams in Canada, eh?