This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
Hendrik said:In the future Bayern will only pay big amounts of money for young talented players who fully convince the board (unlike Agüero).
Magath and Rummenigge saw that Agüero kid play a few times live in Argentina but he failed to impress during those games. And no one in their right mind would have paid friggin 22 million euros for that kid except for Atletico, no one.smoove said:uh-ha, who'll convice the board? the second coming of jesus christ?
True. Unproven players like Karimi, dos Santos, Santa Cruz etc. all came for cheap.when has bayern ever taken a risk with a transfer?
meh, European football is more about good team play and luck than quality because of the knockout stages. Bayern's 2001 CL winning side was way poorer based on individual talent than the current one. The likes Jancker, Zickler, Jeremies, Andersson or Linke were actually important parts of the team. But together they were a great unit.they'll be no1 in the bundesliga with many years to come just by buying the best players the league as to offer. but they're set to struggle on european level.
It will be tough to win this match though it would be nice, the winner of the League Cup receives €2M, not too bad.Tifon said:Why nobody talks about the next match against Schalke in the league cup.
I mean, its not an important competition, but you get a trophy, and one trophy more is always good .
Bayern finally learnt last Friday they had lost out to Real Madrid in the race to sign Netherlands and Manchester United star striker Ruud van Nistelrooy. "We're definitely not pleased, because we'd like to have completed the transfer. I'm not making any secret of that," chairman Karl-Heinz Rummenigge told fcbayern.de en route to the club's brief tour of Japan. "But the player himself decided for Madrid, and we have to accept that."
Club maintains strict principles
Ultimately, the potential switch foundered on the transfer fee demanded by United, general manager Uli Hoeneß explained on Sunday in Tokyo. "If we had offered what ManU wanted, the player would be ours," the board director declared, but that was more than Bayern were prepared to pay. "We'd have had to do something which goes completely against this club's philosophy."
"We did everything we could," Rummenigge reported. Bayern had in fact increased their initial offer for the Netherlands striker by almost 50 percent, Hoeneß revealed, but Madrid were prepared to top that, and thus struck the winning deal with the Manchester club.
Van Nistelrooy rings to explain
The player himself would have happily joined Bayern. The 29-year-old even rang Hoeneß last Friday evening at around half-past ten to explain his final decision. "I thought that was very commendable. He said thank you, and said it had been a very difficult decision," the Munich general manager reported, "but he felt unable to hold out and declare he still wanted a move to Bayern."
One decisive factor playing out in the background was the fact that the player's wife is heavily pregnant and will be unable to fly in just a few days. Van Nistelrooy wanted a swift decision in order to settle his final destination as fast as possible. He was unable to wait for Bayern to reconsider their position and potentially increase their offer.
Looking to the long term
That apart, Bayern were in any case not prepared to budge on their second and final offer, as the money involved in signing a player who is about to turn 30 would have contradicted the club's "long term perspective," Hoeneß remarked. "We're not interested in success for a single season. For years now, we've been working on creating a successful future."
Germany's leading club would certainly be prepared to pay substantial transfer fees if the circumstances were right. "We'll open up the club purse at some point, but only for a talented youngster we can all agree on," Hoeneß observed.
Transfer activity concluded
With the chapter headed van Nistelrooy now closed, Rummenigge confirmed the club had concluded its transfer activity ahead of the new campaign. "We'll go into the season with the squad we currently have."
The team was fully capable of attractive and successful football, the chairman insisted. Hoeneß indicated he had similarly moved on after learning of van Nistelrooy's decision. "I was angry about it for a day," the general manager explained, "but then I said to myself - life goes on."
fcbayern.de
Haha who's the corrupt billionaire controlling the club? Bayern don't have that kind of money but have to pay off the stadium in the next years, maybe even alone. That's a reason to smartly spend the money.smoove said:bayern have everything to be up there with milan,chelsea or barca.
First off, Deco never was/is not/ won't be one of the best players on the planet.but hell, they didn't want to pay more than 18M€ for Deco when he was 26 and one of the damn best players on the planet.
Even though I don't agree with their transfer policy at times they're far from being morons. Apart from two quality midfielders the squad is good, the new stadium is beautiful and, most importantly, the club is free from debt.hoeness is a somewhat smart man but he's more of a "würstelfabrikant" than a football manager, and rummenigge is one of the biggest morons in the business anyway...
Hendrik said:Haha who's the corrupt billionaire controlling the club? Bayern don't have that kind of money but have to pay off the stadium in the next years, maybe even alone. That's a reason to smartly spend the money.
Well, they wouldn't even need that kind of money, they had oppurtunites to get world-class players for "cheap" [Riquelme in 2001,Deco in 2000 and 2004,Kompany and Camoranesi in 2006,etc.]
First off, Deco never was/is not/ won't be one of the best players on the planet.
Wrong. He's been Barcelona's most important player for two years now, before he was the same for Porto, and he's Portugal's most important player,too.
The thing was that Ballack would have been sold if Deco had come and selling Ballack was not an option in 2004.
Deco >> Ballack
the new stadium is beautiful and, most importantly, the club is free from debt.
I agree
Hendrik said:Yes, Deco is better than Ballack (although not talent wise). So what? Hargreaves too is better than him but far from being one of the best.