Estonia is 2nd in their group, but that does not mean that they are good (they won 2 games, both to Andorra). All I say is that it is too early to judge and that in my opinion Greece has a better chance. As for Finland – 3 last games? 3:1, 2:1, 0:0? And what were the 4 last games? And you are saying that Finland is better than Greece because they are now higher than Greece and that they have better players… Well, Finland are supposed not to loose at the home ground, right?, if they have Hyypia, Litmanen..
Well, you said it yourself – it is not the player selection that matters. It is the game that is showed by the team. Ukraine has more star players than for example Russia (Shevchenko, Rebrov, Luzhny, Shovkovsky, Vaschuk) and the Ukrainian players are known all over the world, but they are hardly better than Russian… I mean you just count your country better just because you have “star” players, and because after 3 games you are 2nd in the group loosing to Greece, drawing with HIGHLY struggling England who did not have many players and changed their manager 3 days before, and beat THE POWERHOUSE ALBANIA…
Greece had 7 players out. Just think about it. 7.
BTW, 4 points by Finland are the points everybody predicted Finland would have in first 3 matches. Nothing special here. This is just a start and, god, Slovenia did not have anyone except Zakhovic, and I thought of they as they were crappy, but they got to the Euro 2000. Finland has lower chances of qualifying, face it, but they do have them. Right now Finland did not show anything thatt could be a reson of why they are better than Greece.