Our site is generously sponsored by:

The best landscaping service Austin and lawn service company in Austin Texas and Cedar Park is Lawn Service Cedar Park.

Lawn Care Service of Cedar Park
100 E Whitestone Blvd
Ste 148, #166
Cedar Park, TX 78613
(512) 595-0884

The best landscaping service leander and lawn service provider in Leander TX is Leander Landscaping Pros.

Leander Lawn and Landscaping Pros
1800 Montana Ct
Leander, TX 78641
USA
(512) 468-2670
Please give them a visit!
  • This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- This is an English forum. Please post only in English.

    2- This is NOT a commercial or advertising forum. All content must be shared for FREE.

    3- No invites or links to Discord, Telegram, WhatsApp, or similar platforms.

    Please take a moment to review our forum rules and guidelines here: SoccerGaming Rules and Guidelines.

    Thank you!

  • This is a quick notice about an upcoming SITE UPDATE:

    Our new main website will be launching soon. During this transition, there may be brief periods of downtime.

    The SoccerGaming forums will remain accessible directly at:

    https://soccergaming.com/forums

    We appreciate your patience and support as we work on improving the platform for everyone.

    Thank you!

QotW: What's the verdict on Video Assistant Referee (VAR) so far?

ChungaHungry

Club Supporter
Messages
138
Reactions
2
Goal-line technology seems to be going well. VAR, on the other hand, has been a divisive topic.

We've had "experiments" in the Club World Cup, the U-20 World Cup, and now the Confederations Cup. It's correctly overturned some decisions, but it's been controversial with others, and problematic elsewhere.

There are three major concerns from my experience:

1) It absolutely RUINS goal celebrations.

In a sport that usually has low scores, immediate and uninterrupted goal celebrations are crucial for the entertainment value.


2) It is not always clear what specific decision the VAR is being used for.

There needs to be clear rules on what VAR can be used for, what it is being used for, and what the outcome of the review is. All the confusion we've seen is because no clear explanation was given in real time about the review, or the interpretation of VAR that leads to the upholding/reversal of a decision.


Colosseo_Video_Goal_Judge_Football_02.jpg



3) It is still subjective.

Hawkeye for ball-tracking uses an objective technology, and goalline decisions benefit for it. VAR is a referral system, and still involves the human element. I'm personally OK with that, so long as point #2 is addressed.


How does everyone else feel about this? Are there other concerns with VAR that need to be addressed?
 
I haven't watched any of the confederations cup or seen a single game with it to be honest - so I can't judge - but I've heard pretty bad things. It seems like to work and not disrupt the flow, there will have to be some kind of limit on the number of times it can be used or the situations in which it is brought up - maybe something like in cricket where each team gets a strictly limited number of challenges.
 
Just watched my first Confed Cup game and the goal-line technology is a great addition, but the video review is ridiculous.

In the Mexico - New Zealand game it took the ref 5 minutes while the clock ticked to review a scuffle between players. He then took two more minutes to discipline them. That sh*t is ridiculous. I'd be more for sanctions after the game than stopping mid-game to review sh*t that aren't goals. They either need to get on it and make it as quick and seamless as possible or scrap it altogether.
 
So that's why the VAR is getting so much hate.
In cricket time isn't that important but in football time is the primary constituent of the game. If 5 mins or more are being wasted then I believe that the VAR should be dropped.
 
It is also terrifying that there is a huge propensity to stick tv commercials in during the deliberations, and give us American football
 
I think it's a great addition and we certainly have the right technology these days to pull this off. If it were to be invested in seriously, and with the correct staff - it could be awesome.
If they'd only invest in making it quick and seamless, and also that viewers at home ALSO got to look at the same review in real-time.
 
I think it's a great addition and we certainly have the right technology these days to pull this off. If it were to be invested in seriously, and with the correct staff - it could be awesome.
If they'd only invest in making it quick and seamless, and also that viewers at home ALSO got to look at the same review in real-time.
100% agree.
 
In order not to waste time, why don't they have somebody watching every situation live at all times, so they could tell the referee within like 5-15 seconds whether it was a penalty for example, or not.

Instead of the referee asking for it and stopping the play?

From what I've heard they've had pretty good success in the Bundesliga with it so far. Quick and professional, German efficiency, so not surprising really.
 
Complete joke in the portuguese league so far, benefitting Benfica as usual.

2 examples to make my point clear:


Legal tackle, followed by a murderous two-foot stomp on the defender's body.
Ref verdict: foul against Belenenses.



Clear dive.
Ref verdict: penalty and a red card for the defender.



VAR did absolutely nothing about these...fucking clowns.
 
Complete joke in the portuguese league so far, benefitting Benfica as usual...
....
...VAR did absolutely nothing about these...fucking clowns.

From the looks of it, it doesn't look like the VAR was even used. I take it that the ref. has to "call it in" and ask for a VAR review - and in these cases, he didn't.
But if I am wrong; we can't blame the VAR technology for corrupted and/or incompetent human referees.
 
Back
Top