• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

WC Matchday 17: [GER v ENG] + [ARG v MEX]

MelvinSmiley

Reserve Team
ShearerM4;2897452 said:
That is also very true. At 55 or so minutes in looking at the game you'd have thought we were in injury time already.

Also Lamps argued with the ref after his kick, instead of going towards Müller.
 

ShearerM4

Fan Favourite
MelvinSmiley;2897457 said:
Also Lamps argued with the ref after his kick, instead of going towards Müller.

Saw him do that a few times today. Stopping midrun to claim something to the ref with German players just running past him. Idiot.

Wouldn't be unhappy for this to be end of him with England.
 

Filipower

Bunburyist
Xifio;2897441 said:
watching the replay, an accurate point is made in the studios by the panel that the linesman is supposed to be in line with the last defender to be in a position to make the offside call, which means he cannot be level with the goal-line ...

extra officials were introduced in the Europa League, and if the various associations wanted to see that carried into the World Cup, they should have spoken up ...

I thought the linesman had made a clanger, but that was not the case ... the linesman was exactly where he should have been; no way he could have made a definitive call if he could not be sure about it from his angle ...

What are you on about? I didn't say the linesman wasn't where he should be, all I'm saying is that with just a tiny bit of technology, all this could be avoided. Even without technology, a blind man could have seen the ball go in, but whatever.



And about all this hype talk, I'm getting sick of it. There are one or two people here who think they are enlightened in the world of football, the heirs of Michels and Happel. Give me a ******* break. Just because you say England are crap after they lose doesn't make you savants. Of course England don't have the team that the press thinks they have, but that was never in point over here in the forums, where people actually watch football. First of all, England did do a good qualifying, good enough to at least presume they wouldn't flop so big this time around. Did they? Perhaps, but there is no doubt that they don't lack the players. No one is saying there are the best in the world, but you guys almost seem like you're creating a backwards hype, saying the England players are worst than they actually are. And for once just get down your self-built pedestals of all knowingness in football and accept that not everyone is all wrong or all right.
 

ShiftyPowers

Make America Great Again
ShearerM4;2897459 said:
Saw him do that a few times today. Stopping midrun to claim something to the ref with German players just running past him. Idiot.

Wouldn't be unhappy for this to be end of him with England.

He's old, this should be it for him.

Taking this in a new direction, does anyone have a historical comparison for Thomas Muller? He doesn't remind me of anyone. His body, position, style of play, and technique seem very unique.
 

Sevillista

Starting XI
Ulysses;2897451 said:
it's not really a mistery, they lack the winning spirit at their national NT they're a sort of Arsenal who always end by losing
No, Arsenal frequently look impressive. England never do.
 

ShiftyPowers

Make America Great Again
Filipower;2897461 said:
And about all this hype talk, I'm getting sick of it. There are one or two people here who think they are enlightened in the world of football, the heirs of Michels and Happel. Give me a ******* break. Just because you say England are crap after they lose doesn't make you savants. Of course England don't have the team that the press thinks they have, but that was never in point over here in the forums, where people actually watch football. First of all, England did do a good qualifying, good enough to at least presume they wouldn't flop so big this time around. Did they? Perhaps, but there is no doubt that they don't lack the players. No one is saying there are the best in the world, but you guys almost seem like you're creating a backwards hype, saying the England players are worst than they actually are. And for once just get down your self-built pedestals of all knowingness in football and accept that not everyone is all wrong or all right.

Totally agree. A++

I'll actually dish out my first positive rep in what must be 2 years.
 

MelvinSmiley

Reserve Team
ShiftyPowers;2897462 said:
He's old, this should be it for him.

Taking this in a new direction, does anyone have a historical comparison for Thomas Muller? He doesn't remind me of anyone. His body, position, style of play, and technique seem very unique.

His body, lol....he has none, hes kind of a cripple. Also ugly as hell. Said it many times, i hate this guy. But i admit, he is very cool in his action as he is in interviews. Kind of scary considering his age.
 

Filipower

Bunburyist
Funny how it gets so stupid that I of all people have to say something like this. I couldn't be happier England are out, just hope Germany, Brasil, Spain and Argentina are next. (H)
 

Gene Reginato

Youth Team
In my years following English football. as a foreigner, I believe there problem is:

Too proud of its league: Yes, the greatest players in the world play in the EPL and La Liga, but it doesn't mean other leagues don't have great players. It maskarades your true potential.

Overhype: Yes, Gerrard and Lampard and Rooney are fantastic, but they aren't the only great players in the world.

No depth in the squad: 3 or 4 good players don't make a great team.

Big stars on their heads: Glen Johnson doesn't become a world beater because he plays alongside the stars, neither is James, Upson and others. If one doesn't have a sense of oneself, one doesn't contribute as much as he could.
 

Sevillista

Starting XI
Filipower;2897461 said:
What are you on about? I didn't say the linesman wasn't where he should be, all I'm saying is that with just a tiny bit of technology, all this could be avoided. Even without technology, a blind man could have seen the ball go in, but whatever.



And about all this hype talk, I'm getting sick of it. There are one or two people here who think they are enlightened in the world of football, the heirs of Michels and Happel. Give me a ******* break. Just because you say England are crap after they lose doesn't make you savants. Of course England don't have the team that the press thinks they have, but that was never in point over here in the forums, where people actually watch football. First of all, England did do a good qualifying, good enough to at least presume they wouldn't flop so big this time around. Did they? Perhaps, but there is no doubt that they don't lack the players. No one is saying there are the best in the world, but you guys almost seem like you're creating a backwards hype, saying the England players are worst than they actually are. And for once just get down your self-built pedestals of all knowingness in football and accept that not everyone is all wrong or all right.
I've been saying they're crap the whole time. (H)

And I know it doesn't make me a savant. That would be far too much credit for simply acknowledging what has been plain to see for 6+ years.
 

ShiftyPowers

Make America Great Again
ShiftyPowers;2897462 said:
Taking this in a new direction, does anyone have a historical comparison for Thomas Muller? He doesn't remind me of anyone. His body, position, style of play, and technique seem very unique.

Johnny Rep, maybe? Any Dutch care to disagree?
 

Xifio

The Von Trapps
Filipower;2897461 said:
What are you on about? I didn't say the linesman wasn't where he should be, all I'm saying is that with just a tiny bit of technology, all this could be avoided.
agreed ... I think it could have been avoided even with just an extra touchline official looking right down the goal-line ...



Filipower;2897461 said:
Even without technology, a blind man could have seen the ball go in
and how are you making this judgment? from your seat in the stadium? for some who has decided to have a go at others for being know-it-alls without a paradigm of grey areas, you seem to be making a lot of absolute observations ...



Filipower;2897461 said:
And about all this hype talk, I'm getting sick of it. There are one or two people here who think they are enlightened in the world of football, the heirs of Michels and Happel. Give me a ******* break. Just because you say England are crap after they lose doesn't make you savants. Of course England don't have the team that the press thinks they have, but that was never in point over here in the forums, where people actually watch football. First of all, England did do a good qualifying, good enough to at least presume they wouldn't flop so big this time around. Did they? Perhaps, but there is no doubt that they don't lack the players. No one is saying there are the best in the world, but you guys almost seem like you're creating a backwards hype, saying the England players are worst than they actually are. And for once just get down your self-built pedestals of all knowingness in football and accept that not everyone is all wrong or all right.
I'll not take the bait at the personal attack, coz it is just not worth responding to ...

but I will correct one thing: this is not the first time I am speaking out about English football and their national team ... I think my track record in that department has been well-established on this forum ... so my posts are not an attempt to kick them when they are down; but it is a bit of "I told you so" ... I think that applies to Sevillista too, though I will let him speak for himself ...

as for their qualifying campaign; well, I think their group was not the most difficult to negotiate, and the runner-up from the group failed to qualify to the finals ... and their most impressive win was against Croatia, who are clearly not the the team they were in 2008, and who finished 3rd in the group behind Ukraine ...

in the friendlies against the bigger nations, England never looked like a major threat, but even I am ready to accept that friendly matches aren't the best guide to a team's ability ...

I just find nothing else to justify the belief that England are better than they have shown at this World Cup ... even watching those English players play for their clubs, I have emphasized time and again (even just before the World Cup in the England National Team thread) the importance of the foreign players in their respective teams to do the hard yards for them ... those big names are considered big because an English product needs English poster players ... and I'm not saying they are worse than they are; I am saying that they aren't as good as the hype makes them out to be ...
 

Filipower

Bunburyist
Again with the hype. You keep comparing us at the forums with tabloid newspapers. Whatever, we'll just agree to disagree...
 

Kibe Kru

Starting XI
you guys are reacting like England lost to the Solomon Islands, or whatever. I don't see any shame in losing to Germany, and as it was said here, they took a lot of unnecessary risks being 2-1 down.
 

fender

Fan Favourite
When you're 3 goals down and you bring on Heskey that says it all. He makes Gyan Asamoah look like Leo Messi.
 

MelvinSmiley

Reserve Team
fender;2897493 said:
When you're 3 goals down and you bring on Heskey that says it all. He makes Gyan Asamoah look like Leo Messi.

What should Capello do? To me it was more a mistake to take off Milner, just as he finally could get behind Boateng.
 

ShearerM4

Fan Favourite
If Heskey was to come on, at least for a defender or something. Like for like with Defoe was crazy.

Especially given that:
1. We needed a goal, then very soon after, goals.
2. All our chances were coming from playing balls to feet and never from high balls in.

No not crazy, stupid.
 

Xifio

The Von Trapps
Filipower;2897482 said:
Again with the hype. You keep comparing us at the forums with tabloid newspapers. Whatever, we'll just agree to disagree...
when there is talk of surprise at the "big names" not performing, I think it is pertinent to bring up hype ... EDIT: and it isn't tabloid hype I am referring to, it is the Prem's and the TV coverage's marketing platform -- ever watched a Prem league match or even the review show and heard their hype of the league and its players? it is product marketing hype, not just tabloid hype ...

and there is nothing you have pointed out that I have missed in my analysis of England or their players over the years ... if you have indeed laughed off the hype, then I would be questioning your judgment, or at least your criteria of judgment, in this matter ...
 


Top