Filipower;2897461 said:
What are you on about? I didn't say the linesman wasn't where he should be, all I'm saying is that with just a tiny bit of technology, all this could be avoided.
agreed ... I think it could have been avoided even with just an extra touchline official looking right down the goal-line ...
Filipower;2897461 said:
Even without technology, a blind man could have seen the ball go in
and how are you making this judgment? from your seat in the stadium? for some who has decided to have a go at others for being know-it-alls without a paradigm of grey areas, you seem to be making a lot of absolute observations ...
Filipower;2897461 said:
And about all this hype talk, I'm getting sick of it. There are one or two people here who think they are enlightened in the world of football, the heirs of Michels and Happel. Give me a ******* break. Just because you say England are crap after they lose doesn't make you savants. Of course England don't have the team that the press thinks they have, but that was never in point over here in the forums, where people actually watch football. First of all, England did do a good qualifying, good enough to at least presume they wouldn't flop so big this time around. Did they? Perhaps, but there is no doubt that they don't lack the players. No one is saying there are the best in the world, but you guys almost seem like you're creating a backwards hype, saying the England players are worst than they actually are. And for once just get down your self-built pedestals of all knowingness in football and accept that not everyone is all wrong or all right.
I'll not take the bait at the personal attack, coz it is just not worth responding to ...
but I will correct one thing: this is not the first time I am speaking out about English football and their national team ... I think my track record in that department has been well-established on this forum ... so my posts are not an attempt to kick them when they are down; but it is a bit of "I told you so" ... I think that applies to Sevillista too, though I will let him speak for himself ...
as for their qualifying campaign; well, I think their group was not the most difficult to negotiate, and the runner-up from the group failed to qualify to the finals ... and their most impressive win was against Croatia, who are clearly not the the team they were in 2008, and who finished 3rd in the group behind Ukraine ...
in the friendlies against the bigger nations, England never looked like a major threat, but even I am ready to accept that friendly matches aren't the best guide to a team's ability ...
I just find nothing else to justify the belief that England are better than they have shown at this World Cup ... even watching those English players play for their clubs, I have emphasized time and again (even just before the World Cup in the England National Team thread) the importance of the foreign players in their respective teams to do the hard yards for them ... those big names are considered big because an English product needs English poster players ... and I'm not saying they are worse than they are; I am saying that they aren't as good as the hype makes them out to be ...