visions of a red eye

[::Jason::]

it you want to know why I made this photo-manipulation -> http://www.deviantart.com/view/5968920/

 

[Andrew]

Kool but i dont really understand the concept

 

[Seb]

i kno its 'vision of a red eye but ermmm ' wats it sposed to be'

 

[::shinji::]

pretty weak man... (:/)

 

[::Jason::]

the idea is to resemble what things look like with an eye-injury.

 

[Andrew]

Its pretty average, i mean what have you done, gotten a picture and blurred parts of the image. Cmon Man, you critisize everyones work, and look at yours

 

[Knight Saber]

I'd agree with what most people have said, it's just been blurred.

 

[::Jason::]

Originally posted by Andrew
Its pretty average, i mean what have you done, gotten a picture and blurred parts of the image. Cmon Man, you critisize everyones work, and look at yours

you don't seem to get it.
I resembled what things looked like half an hour after that incident.
It's not a cool sig with plenty of filters. (:/)

I can take critisism, but always when I critisize someone, I try to use valid points, not just say 'it sucks' (done that too anyway.. )

I suggest reading what it's all about.

 

[::Jason::]

Originally posted by Vazza
Correct me if I'm wrong but haven't you just blurred an image? It's an OK idea but like Shinji said...

I blurred it differently on different parts and brushed it up and added the hole of the floorball kept seeing.

that's just what it looked like.

 

[Stotty]

still dont rate it.........if i was to take a picture and blur it........would i go down in your goodbooks?

 

[Ebonix]

It is pretty strange. The idea just doesn't make sense even after you explain it and the photo is just eventless, theres nothing to focus on.

 

[Stotty]

i was tired and my eyes were hurting so the colours didn't look right. Last tuesday i also had a wank . I shall call this wankedyetstillgothurty eyes

 

[::Jason::]

nick

the actual thing turned out more like a journal entry than nothing artistically special anyway.

 

[PhiLLer]

This is weak. There's no sense to it and basically it's just applying a bit of blur here and there, there's no skill involved. And then you're trying to make it sound more important and more skillful than it really is by giving it a fancy title and a useless explenation.

You're certainly not good enough to critisise other people's work and this just shows it.

 

[C-B]

I see no difference than usual.

 

[::shinji::]

Originally posted by PhiLLer
And then you're trying to make it sound more important and more skillful than it really is by giving it a fancy title and a useless explenation.

basically what I was thinking...attatching a story to it doesn't make it any more appealing.

 

[ttwellman]

are you serious? this is kinda weak dude. Actually... really weak.

 

[::Jason::]

what makes it 'so weak' then?
It was basically meant to be a journal with an image.
It's always cool to repeat what shinji&co say anyway..

 

[ttwellman]

I'm not repeating what Shinji and them say for the hell of it, i agree, numbnuts.

That really is a waste of time.

You blurred an image, and expect something good.

This is almost as good as when u took some one elses 3d render, and put 2d around it, and thought u were the best graphics artist around.

 

[::Jason::]

that's far from the truth twellman..