The Official Manchester United Thread [2006/2007]

[RockShow]

pede there is a diffrence between the money spent by Man Utd and chealski. Utd were the best supported team in the country long before they were sucessful and their wealth has been obtained over many years of the biggest supported club through thick and thin.

chelsea on the other got a sugar daddy who spared no expense in buying out all the top talent he could lay his hands on. chesea as a club with its meager support/income and small stadium could not do that on its own.

if the sugar daddy left tomorow chelsea as a club would fold. if glazer left Man Utd tomorow we would not.

so here is the difference, the Man Utd Fans are the ones who made their club successful. while chelseas sugar daddy was responsible for their success. its apples and oranges mate.

 

[d3adly]

paul scholes for the player of the year.

 

[VanTheMin]

pede u seem to try so hard.....
stand up for the elections...you may shortly take over Lee Stewart.....

 

[didy]

Look Chelsea spent all that money but if they did not win EPL the last 2 years would you be wining about the amount of money we are spending? Be honest.

 

[Daz]

Look Chelsea spent all that money but if they did not win EPL the last 2 years would you be wining about the amount of money we are spending? Be honest.

Hahaha i'd personally be whining even more! Spending £200mill+ and NOT winning anything?! That would be pure comedy and ridiculous.

 

[untouchable]

Look Chelsea spent all that money but if they did not win EPL the last 2 years would you be wining about the amount of money we are spending? Be honest.

 

[pede54]

pede there is a diffrence between the money spent by Man Utd and chealski. Utd were the best supported team in the country long before they were sucessful and their wealth has been obtained over many years of the biggest supported club through thick and thin.

chelsea on the other got a sugar daddy who spared no expense in buying out all the top talent he could lay his hands on. chesea as a club with its meager support/income and small stadium could not do that on its own.

if the sugar daddy left tomorow chelsea as a club would fold. if glazer left Man Utd tomorow we would not.

so here is the difference, the Man Utd Fans are the ones who made their club successful. while chelseas sugar daddy was responsible for their success. its apples and oranges mate.

We are talking about what indeed kickstarted Man U on the road to glory. That was a millionaire who invested his money into the club and saved them from extinction. Exactly the SAME scenario that Chelsea experienced 3 years ago. That is why there is NO difference at all between Man U's fortunes and ours.

If your millionaire had not have saved your club, they simply would NOT EXIST today. There would not even be a Manchester United. The same goes for us.

You just don't wanna hear that though do you. You seem to live in this dreamworld where Man U made it without the help of a rich benefactor. Well, sorry to ruin it for you all but these are recorded facts in the history of Man United.

You know its true and factual but its something that you just dont like talking about. This is actually more important than the money you might have made since by selling replica shirts around the world. Shirts made by underpaid exploited eastern slave labour as a matter of fact. Yeah thats very moral isn't it. Something to really be proud of huh?

 

[barthez4]

This bickering reminds me of my relatives.

United supporters, he's winding you up. Sure, it's annoying and constant, but there is truth in what he says about our wealthy past (and our history - yeah, we have one).

Pede, good show. And thanks for the Larsson goal. If not for you, who knows how the Villa match would've gone!?!?

 

[pede54]

This bickering reminds me of my relatives.

United supporters, he's winding you up. Sure, it's annoying and constant, but there is truth in what he says about our wealthy past (and our history - yeah, we have one).

Pede, good show. And thanks for the Larsson goal. If not for you, who knows how the Villa match would've gone!?!?

Exactly my friend.

No probs about the goal mate....I just felt that I needed to do something to get ol' Larsson motivated:mexican:

 

[Callum]

you really need to motivate shevchenko.

 

[pede54]

I AM working on it mate but he don't seem to be responding.:mexican:

 

[SlowSilver]

These Shevchenko jokes are getting old..

 

[MikeyM]

See the Daily Mirror's trying to sell Ronaldo again! I'd completely loose any faith in SAF if he dumped Ronaldo for any money, Barca can just f**k off with Xavi!


Mike

 

[Help?]

Yeah, for all these jokes he still has 6 goals. Which is total ****, but 6 is not 0

 

[untouchable]

These Shevchenko jokes are getting old..

We'll stop making the jokes when he actually manages to put the ball in the back of the net before the world ends.

 

[d3adly]

not 1 player from our first team is going anywhere. we need all of our players for the league, fa cup and champs league, except for maybe richardson. we actually have a decent squad that is about 35% on the road to winning the title.

 

[RockShow]

you keep thinking that pede. i will leave you to your fantasies, like winning the prem 3 seasons in a row, or maybe winning the champs league, Doh!

 

[Callum]

These Shevchenko jokes are getting old..

Yes sir.

 

[SlowSilver]

Good lad.

 

[soccerking_adi]

cool thread

man u made a cool thread but one question where the heck did get authority to build a official thread.
one more question Do u think van nistelrooy should be back in manu