This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
Jimbob said:Pete, How long has Kluivert been French? Heheheheh
Yossarian said:Board up your windows, double and triple lock your doors, chastity belt your female companions/relatives, and leave on the lights, brothers, because we've got a Chelsea fan roaming about and lurking in our thread.
*Crosses oneself ten times*
Typical Chelsinski gloryhunter!!!pede54 said:oops i cant believe i typed that .....cheers Jimbob.......
I take it sarcasm, humor is lost on you then? *sigh*pede54 said:Man U loser......and talking about gloryhunting......ahem......f.u.c.king has beens....
man last season you hated Arsenal....now its Chelsea.....i suppose thats 'cos your own team are so poor huh?
anyway stop spamming the Arsenal thread.Intelligent conversation only in here mate..........
pede54 said:so you just wanna ignore the negatives then?Forget about the World Cup 2002 and Euro 2004?You will not get an all round oicture of anybody by taking that route.
Lamps is not a defender,but for a midfield player he does a good job as a forward too.Henry is a forward and that is ALL he can do.Granted he is good at his job,but he is impotent anywhere else on the field.As i said before the two cannot be compared because they are 2 completely different players ,playing in 2 completely different positions.
Sure France won the world cup 98 (7 years ago)but to be fair Henry did not have a lot of input into that squad at the time.the forwards were Youri Djorkaeff , Ibrahim BA ,Patrick LOKO, Christophe DUGARRY and Kluivert.Henry was on the bench sometimes, and scored one penalty,in a shoot out with Italy in the quarter finals.Not a big influence on their world cup win was it? He got a medal as part of the squad.
Same with Euro 2000.He scored 3 goals in the group stages and thats it.They even pulled him off in one game for Anelka,who scored instantly.We are not talking about past history mate,otherwise we might as well bring in other players with a much better career history than Henry.Sure he has scored important goals,but he has also NOT scored important goals as well.I like the way that you mention all the positive games in Europe but fail to mention the games when your lot looked poor,inept and outclassed.Listen ,Henry is a great striker.Nobody is denying that,but unfortunately one good striker is not enough.He can't do it on his own. You need to be objective to put over a fair argument but you do not do that.Too much Arsenal bias mate.......
??????????pede54 said:An obvious point that i made.Although Frank does not have pace,he still scores plenty of goals.Your midfield does nor benefit from Henry in the same way
pede54 said:Man U loser......and talking about gloryhunting......ahem......f.u.c.king has beens....
man last season you hated Arsenal....now its Chelsea.....i suppose thats 'cos your own team are so poor huh?
anyway stop spamming the Arsenal thread.Intelligent conversation only in here mate..........
Porks said:What are you doing in here then, huh?
pede54 said:i could ask you the same thing newbie.........
Ogsimon....you are still talking about goal count man.....and that is not the argument.I just revert to my original statement in answer to someone elses comparisons of Frank and Thierry.....you cannot compare a midfield player with a striker.As for those two.They are both the best that you can get.
Untouchable.....Humour and sarcasm are my forte's,but if i missed that in your post ,then i apologise for being to hasty in my rude reply......
Kulixs said:Lampard is the best player in the EPL, hands down.
Bobby, I tread carefully around your posts, wary of the sarcasm that usually acompanies them. But here, I fail to see any. Firstly, they should have won that game, no question, and if Grahme Poll had any balls, they would have. Secondly, from what little I have seen of him and the way people in this thread talk about Flammini, he cant be considered horrible at all.Bobby said:Chelsea failed to beat Arsenal when Arsenal started a midfield of Pires - Fabregas (17 years old) - Flamini (Horrible) - Reyes (Inconsistant). To top it off, Manuel Almunia was in goal.
Explain, if he's soo damn good, why couldn't he beat them?
And Henry DOES benefit Arsenal's midfield, he draws in defenders allowing Pires to score so many goals.
Mind you, Pires outscored any Man Utd striker, from midfield.