SG's Babe Competition 2013

[Back Door Skip]

I'd sodomize her.

 

[Mus]

Holy crap

 

[jschuck12001]

Yeah its Luisa Zissman, she has to have one of the best bodies I've ever seen and these pics aren't touched up.

AZ how do you give this ass a 2/10?

 

[Alex]

I'd not give the bum a huge score though. It's round, but sideways round, not round on depth (if that makes sense) - which what I like. Width by itself is a bad thing I think.

That style of bikini bottom makes any bum look better.

 

[jschuck12001]

Looks like she lift weights and does squats, I don't think I've ever seen a British woman who was that curvy.

 

[chygry]

She's British? : o I don't know her name, but by looking at her face i thought she was Italian or something.

 

[Mandieta6]

The 2/10 was in jest but her ass isn't that great. Her bikini is accenuating but there's room for improvement.

 

[Alex]

The 2/10 was in jest but her ass isn't that great. Her bikini is accenuating but there's room for improvement.

Yep exactly

 

[Back Door Skip]

You don't need a huge ass when you got curves like that.

 

[Mandieta6]

Artificial? The ass is most important, or at least second most important of a woman's curves.

I certainly did not expect this from our resident Latino, Back Door Skip.

 

[Back Door Skip]

More cushion isn't necessarily better for the pushin'. She needs to feel a little pain to know who's boss.

 

[Mus]

She's also a filthy slut

 

[Mus]

And that's a good thing

 

[jschuck12001]

Yep exactly

The 2/10 was in jest but her ass isn't that great. Her bikini is accenuating but there's room for improvement.

I see what your saying but 2/10. I'm all about the booty and could care less about boobs but even if I'm being highly critical her ass is still at least a 6/10.

This is a 2/10

 

[MaestroZidane]

That's more like a -10...

 

[Mandieta6]

Yeah, that's why I said "in jest". I would have sex with her in a heart-beat. Doesn't crack so much as my Top 20 (probably even more) of celebrities and internet babes though.

 

[jschuck12001]

Ass is lacking. 2/10 wouldnotbang

I figured everyone was grading on a curve but when you posted the quote above It threw me off.

 

[Alex]

You don't need a huge ass when you got curves like that.

Not suggesting it needs to be bigger, just a better shape

 

[Sir Didier Drogba]

I see what your saying but 2/10. I'm all about the booty and could care less about boobs but even if I'm being highly critical her ass is still at least a 6/10.

This is a 2/10

There needs to be a universal standardized grading system. Some people grade with 5 being an average girl and anything under 5 being below average and unbangable, (4s maybe permitted when drunk), others like me lump all untouchable girls in as 1 and start with 2 being a generally unattractive girl but with some appealing touches and 3 being a generally average, fun for a night chick. On my scale a 6 is pretty damn hot. Others start with a 10 being the girl they consider hottest in the world and then grade down, so a girl 10% less hot would be a 9, 20% an 8 etc. This leads to many discrepancies of interpretation.

 

[yoyo913]

I am very in-tune with my rating scale:

1: you question God's cruelty
2: disguising
3: very ugly
4: clear physical trait that makes her unattractive
5: not attractive, with nice personality you might think she's ok for a date, but you would regret it
6: meh, might be ok but nothing to get excited for, average(or slightly below), has some attractive traits but also some unattractive ones (about 50-50)
7: pretty, slightly above average, cute, would go on a date with, mostly attractive
8: very pretty, hot-ish
9: stunning, hot, could be a model if she tried
10: phenomenal specimen, cannot believe such beauty exists