• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

SG's Babe Competition 2013

Chacarita Juniors

The artist formerly known as ronnifan9
 

Alex

sKIp_E
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
What's wrong with the last one? She's gorgeous. Weirdo.
 

Back Door Skip

Pedro
Staff member
If we're being picky, the last chick looks like she's got a pretty squared, guyish chin in the third pic. She might even look "older". That body is straight bangin', though.
 

Alex

sKIp_E
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Lord Mandieta6;3618998 said:
I meant the last one out of the set of 3 (with the mannish old chick and the blonde).

Oh ok. Yes that was the ugliest photo. Isn't it the same chick though?
 

Mandieta6

Red Card - Life
Life Ban
Exactly. When you see two pics of the same chick and she looks ugly in one of them, she is probably ugly (ugly meaning not (especially) attractive).
 

Alex

sKIp_E
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Lord Mandieta6;3619018 said:
Exactly. When you see two pics of the same chick and she looks ugly in one of them, she is probably ugly (ugly meaning not (especially) attractive).

But you didn't think that when I showed you all those ugly Upton photos
 

Alex

sKIp_E
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
That's a cop out. It's about a total package. If I showed you a picture of a fat chick with a pretty face (that wasn't Upton) you would say she is unattractive. Now don't start saying that your point was purely about someone's face looking bad on one photo can make you think they're not hot. Your point was that with Photoshop and make up these days, if you find an ugly photo of a chick, it's probably just more of a true reflection....

My point is you ignore this theory when it suits you.
 

Mandieta6

Red Card - Life
Life Ban
It's not about total package, it's about the face, at least when discussing whether someone is ugly or not. There is a clear distinction in both Spanish and Hebrew (I daresay in all languages) between having a good body and being pretty. A face is ugly or pretty, barring someone getting caught with a weird expression. A bodypart, due to the additional movement, can always seem unattractive from a certain perspective. And Upton has a bad ass, anyway, I don't think I've ever said otherwise. You're getting the correlation wrong. I don't have a bias for Upton and ignore evidence because of that bias, I just find her attractive and argue against detractors. If you show me someone with similar proportions to Upton, I will probably like them, too. This isn't about Upton specifically, I don't see how ignoring my theory would suit me in anyway.
 

Alex

sKIp_E
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Because you're stubborn and are blinded by your idea of what Upton is.

I agree, pretty generally means face. However when you say "an ugly photo" it's not necessarily referring to face. And if it is, your theory is ridiculous. You can find an ugly photo of nearly everyone, just because the photo is taken at an inopportune time.
 

Mandieta6

Red Card - Life
Life Ban
I said "looks ugly in a photo" not "an ugly photo", there's a difference. You can also find a bad photo of any bodypart, how was that not ridiculous but only considering the face is? The theory allows for the caveat of the opportunistic photo, I never said it didn't.

I don't see where you get the Upton thing or why it is even relevant.
 

Sir Didier Drogba

Head Official
Alex;3619318 said:
That's a cop out. It's about a total package. If I showed you a picture of a fat chick with a pretty face (that wasn't Upton) you would say she is unattractive. Now don't start saying that your point was purely about someone's face looking bad on one photo can make you think they're not hot. Your point was that with Photoshop and make up these days, if you find an ugly photo of a chick, it's probably just more of a true reflection....

My point is you ignore this theory when it suits you.
I totally wouldnt say she was unattractive
 

Chacarita Juniors

The artist formerly known as ronnifan9
I think we can all at least agree on a girl who has the 'total package' like Stephanie Cayo, the Peruvian chick and at the same time we all have our preferences on what we like on a girl.

I for one prefer a chick with a banging body and an ok face...a nicely shaped ass over big tits. Someone else will prefer boobs over ass and a pretty face with a not so shapely body.

Everyone is different on what they look for physically in a girl. Ass (body), face, tits in that order for me.

Gaby Espino is hot as hell, no one can deny that fact. If you think she isn't THAT pretty...well, that's just you being picky and frankly we can all play that game.
 

newbie original

We apologize for keeping the yellow too long
Yellow Card
ronnifan9;3619673 said:
I think we can all at least agree on a girl who has the 'total package' like Stephanie Cayo...
Gaby Espino is hot as hell, no one can deny that fact. If you think she isn't THAT pretty...well, that's just you being picky and frankly we can all play that game.

You simply pulled two names out of thin air. Two completely unknown random names.

We can all spend a little time on Google and do the same.

Let me try this out and think of two random names - one English and one Spanish:
1. Diana Valdez
2. Stephanie Smith

I await your response on vaunted clef.
 


Top