The privileged few vs. the impoverished masses
Originally posted by Vagegast
She didn't do anything for you? That's because you haven't lost a leg (or legs) by a landmine. The people she cared about were the people who weren't rich snobby British kids with internet-connections and too much time on their hands. The "mob grief" was there because they weren't so selfishly and egotistically thinking about themselves, unlike you.
Thanks for the sweeping generalisation. :/
Wow, she undertook such hard work: shaking hands; photo opportunities; wore countless dresses, that cost more than an Ethiopian family would see in a life time; incalculable skiing holidays; wore jewellery that could have been sold, and the capital accrued, used to help poor familes...
Yeah, she did so much- sorry I forgot.
I really think about others, that's where the problem lies. I look at the asperity that poor people suffer, and I contrast that with how well the rich live. We live in a very unfair world. Why should Diana have had such privilege, just because of her inbred 'Royal' status? Why was she better than an Indian woman, who works for 16 hours a day, in a 'sweatshop'??
Look at the 'Royal' lineage, they have ruled the world for hundreds of years. All of the European 'Royalty' are related to each another, in one form or another.
Hey, did you know that George Bush is related to the Queen? that is a documented, and accepted fact! It's even in Burke's Peerage!
They got there, by deception; butchery; and plain dishonesty. By Machiavellian means! Yeah- ironic- isn't it! lol
She was just a figure-head- that's all. A 'brood mare' as she herself once said. They needed the Spencer bloodline.
Do you know how much the British tax-payer has to hand over- to keep those parasites in the splender that they enjoy??
What's so special about
them?
/Edit/
She was just the 'pretty face', of an extremely ugly, and unfair system. To be honest, I bore her no malice; she was just a 'pawn' in the system...
/Edit/
.
Just a little joke i heard the other day