Two alternatives for Attack/defense value:
1. KONAMI's style, attack/defense SHOULD be relative to players' favorite positions, that's to say, FW's defense is relative lower than other positions and CBT's defense is relative higher.
2.CM's style, they are both described by such unified attributes as 'positioning','off the ball','marking',etc. Then a great DMF (like Makelele, 90) will be better in defense than a good CBT (like Hyypia, 85). And many CBTs' offensive value is in a higher level than KONAMI settings (like Terry, 65).
I prefer to CM style. It's more realistic. Attack/defense is independent to positions.
Your opinion? Discussion makes best choice.
1. KONAMI's style, attack/defense SHOULD be relative to players' favorite positions, that's to say, FW's defense is relative lower than other positions and CBT's defense is relative higher.
2.CM's style, they are both described by such unified attributes as 'positioning','off the ball','marking',etc. Then a great DMF (like Makelele, 90) will be better in defense than a good CBT (like Hyypia, 85). And many CBTs' offensive value is in a higher level than KONAMI settings (like Terry, 65).
I prefer to CM style. It's more realistic. Attack/defense is independent to positions.
Your opinion? Discussion makes best choice.