mark77
Transfer Guru
I don't feel like going into details but today a FIGC judge quit saying that he was not a fan of the "methods" used in yesterday's verdict.
One of Juve's ex-attorney said that there are anomalies in the reason why Juve was sent in B with -30pts.
The verdict says that a single call breaks only article 1. In yesterday's verdict they added all the calls that break article 1 and totaled it in breaking article 6. Wich is not correct. 1+1+1+1+1+1 doesn't equal to 6 in this case. You can't break one law and get punished for another one.
We'll see what happens. I'm not too confident though.
One of Juve's ex-attorney said that there are anomalies in the reason why Juve was sent in B with -30pts.
The verdict says that a single call breaks only article 1. In yesterday's verdict they added all the calls that break article 1 and totaled it in breaking article 6. Wich is not correct. 1+1+1+1+1+1 doesn't equal to 6 in this case. You can't break one law and get punished for another one.
We'll see what happens. I'm not too confident though.