FM2005 Attributes Explained

[Tom]

postboosting, thats what its called

TROD.

 

[The Kop Kid]

Very good post TROD. One thing that might be worth adding is that the 'natural fitness' attribute is also an indicator of how hard you can train players and/or play them without their condition going down.

Before I forget, who is Xavi Alonso? Does Xabi have a brother.

 

[Rob]

Well I don't follow the crowd.

So ...

Worst post ever TROD

 

[Tom]

cheers, also APARANTLY Xabi alonso is called Xavi Alonso honestly

oh and he does have brother, i think he plays for Real Sociedad, Mikel Alonso? something like that.

TROD.

 

[Andreas]

Great thread, really useful.

I'm guessing you're a Liverpool supporter, since all the player examples here are Liverpool (or ex-Liverpool) players. Anyway, I'm missing Paul Scholes as an example in First Touch, Roy Keane in Leadership, Ole Gunnar Solskjær in Finishing etc.

 

[Tom]

ah yes, but i was doing it on FM basis, and while i agree with all three i dont THINK Ole Gunnar Solskjaer has finishing 20 on FM, he should do, but i dont think he does

TROD.

 

[rpvankasteren]

He does

 

[Tom]

right ive edited it

TROD.

 

[Hopeunited]

I don't see "Temperament" in my game...

 

[Tom]

hidden stat bud.

TROD.

 

[ngyc]

i have a small suggestion here.

can you have a thread to talk about the tactic option such as Hold Up Ball, Width, Tempo and etc...sometimes i get confuse with the option's meaning

 

[Áļéאָ]

how u mean... They just do what the word says

 

[Tom]

explaining when they should and should not be used? those kind of things?

TROD.

 

[ngyc]

explaining when they should and should not be used? those kind of things?

TROD.

yea, some sort like that. serious said, i still not understand whats the actual meaning by zonal marking, hold up ball until now

 

[Andreas]

Why isn't this thread stickied anymore? It's a great and very helpful thread.

ngyc: I'll try to make a "tactics guide" for the things you asked for.

 

[Tom]

thanks andreas but i think you'll find its part of the FAQ nowadays

 

[Andreas]

Ok, but it would still be allright to have this thread separate from the other, it's harder to find the stuff you want when there's so many different things in one thread

 

[rpvankasteren]

If we were to split up the FAQ, we'd have to make an FAQ subforum - to stop the threads from either getting lost in the main forum or clogging up the first page as stickies.
The subforum itself would hardly ever be used either, giving it little right to exist.

Plus, we'd have to do severe moderation on the threads to keep it a decent FAQ. Something I'm heavily against, as it tends to either take quality posts away from people, or put entirely different content in them.

 

[Tom]

i agree totally, for me the FAQ does everything it needs to do, so i dont see the problem.

 

[Filipower]

faq it then..