• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

UEFA EURO 2012 - Poland/Ukraine

RobbieD_PL

Unreliable deceiver
Staff member
Moderator
Coruja;3255557 said:
Poland showed some heart, the players did good, i think the coach just made the wrong choices about how to approach the game.

He thought a draw was worth more than a win.
 

Champion757

Youth Team
RobbieD_PL;3255556 said:
Yeh but because there was no three way tie, the goal differential didn't matter anyway.

Yeah but that's just it. Now there has to be a 3 way tie for goal differential to come into play. Two team ties in group stages were always decided by goal differential, not head to head result.
 

RobbieD_PL

Unreliable deceiver
Staff member
Moderator
Well apparently it has been decided by the head-to-head result as Greece are through.
 

Champion757

Youth Team
RobbieD_PL;3255559 said:
He thought a draw was worth more than a win.

actually i think it was the opposite. no matter what happened in Greece vs Russia, the only way Poland could have qualified was with a win. A draw would have given them 3 draws, 3 points, and Czech and Russia would have at least 4. of course in the old days when wins were only 2 points, 0-0-3 was treated the same as 1-1-1. but not anymore.
 

RobbieD_PL

Unreliable deceiver
Staff member
Moderator
Coruja;3255561 said:
I wish Portugal had a player like Lewandowski on the front. : (

That's probably why we drew 0-0 in the first game at the national stadium.
 

RobbieD_PL

Unreliable deceiver
Staff member
Moderator
1. Higher number of points obtained in the matches played between the teams in question;

2. Superior goal difference resulting from the matches played between the teams in question (if more than two teams finish equal on points);

3. Higher number of goals scored in the matches played between the teams in question (if more than two teams finish equal on points);

4. If, after having applied criteria 1 to 3 to more than two teams, two teams still have an equal ranking, criteria 1 to 3 are reapplied exclusively to the matches between the two teams in question to determine the final rankings of the two teams. If this procedure does not lead to a decision, criteria 5 to 10 apply in the order given;

5. Superior goal difference in all group matches;

6. Higher number of goals scored in all group matches;

7. If two teams which are tied in all criteria 1 to 6 play their last group match against each other (i.e., the result is a draw and the two teams have the same number of points, goal difference and goals scored), and provided no other teams within the group have the same number of points, the ranking of the two teams in question is determined by penalty shoot-out.
 
S

Sir Calumn

Guest
You see, I think those rules are ludicrous. It should always just be goal difference across all matches. Simple.
 

Champion757

Youth Team
RobbieD_PL;3255571 said:
1. Higher number of points obtained in the matches played between the teams in question;

2. Superior goal difference resulting from the matches played between the teams in question (if more than two teams finish equal on points);

3. Higher number of goals scored in the matches played between the teams in question (if more than two teams finish equal on points);

Thanks for the post. Isn't this much more complicated then it was before? So instead of overall goal differential being the simple tiebreaker, it basically amounts to head to head result first if two teams are tied, and if 3 teams are tied, it's not overall point differential anymore, but the point differential from the match played between the teams?

if that is the case, then the overall goal differential statistic that they show when they list the teams in the group table is nearly meaningless now. you used to be able to calculate the scenarios just by looking at the table, right?
 

RobbieD_PL

Unreliable deceiver
Staff member
Moderator
Well head to head result also makes sense. You've just beaten a team, but because they scored more goals earlier, they get to go through?

Also, it's not just that overall point/goal differential doesn't count. It's just that the matches played between the teams take precedence.
 

Champion757

Youth Team
Sir Sir_Didier_Drogba;3255572 said:
You see, I think those rules are ludicrous. It should always just be goal difference across all matches. Simple.

Me too Sir. It was better and simpler that way because you each game was equally important and you could keep track of it all easily through the table.
 

Champion757

Youth Team
RobbieD_PL;3255575 said:
Well head to head result also makes sense. You've just beaten a team, but because they scored more goals earlier, they get to go through?

Maybe in American football, but in soccer football goal differential was the first tiebreaker in group stages. In previous World Cups it was the case. I know in the past they sometimes tested new rules in the euro championships, like in 2004 with the silver goal extra time, but never anything like this.
 

RobbieD_PL

Unreliable deceiver
Staff member
Moderator
I've just checked and it was the same in 2004. The matches between the teams in question also took precedence above overall goals/points earned for a tie-breaker during that tournament.
 

Champion757

Youth Team
RobbieD_PL;3255587 said:
I've just checked and it was the same in 2004. The matches between the teams in question also took precedence above overall goals/points earned for a tie-breaker during that tournament.

interesting. yeah i remembered they tried the silver goal extra time in that one, but they changed it back to full 30 minute extra time in 2008. do you know if the group stage tiebreakers the same in euro 2008? if so, then maybe these tiebreakers are specific to euro championships. haven't world cup group stages and other major tournaments used overall goal differential?
 

Champion757

Youth Team
yeah in WC 2010, Article 39, no. 5, the first three tiebreakers are

a) greatest number of points obtained in all group matches;
b) goal difference in all group matches;
c) greatest number of goals scored in all group matches.

I guess it's just a euro championships specific thing. This highlights a huge difference in this tournament that i don't think many people were aware of.
 

MaestroZidane

YELLOW CARD: Untrustworthy
RobbieD_PL;3255587 said:
I've just checked and it was the same in 2004. The matches between the teams in question also took precedence above overall goals/points earned for a tie-breaker during that tournament.

This makes perfect sense. I would have been more disappointed if the loser went ahead and the winner was eliminated.
 

mogolos

Starting XI
Advocaat: “We totally outclassed Greece. We gave away the first goal and didn't recuperate from that blow. They are masters at bleeding a match to death.

"I'm not really too interested in what others say about me. My staff worked really hard, we were undefeated for 16 matches.

"We were unfortunate. We should have won today but that's football so compliments to Greece."
 

Arnau

NGR LVR
Another brilliant one (H)

 


Top