-
This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
SG's Ultimate Draft Challenge 2016
- Thread starter ShiftyPowers
- Start date
Sir Didier Drogba
Head Official
We're really replaying those games? Fuck that
Sent from my SM-J120FN using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-J120FN using Tapatalk
yoyo913
Team Captain
Massive, sorry bro I won't have time to wait to post the seeding. It's because I'm going away and want to get it done before then. Once I come up with the seeding I'll post the threads right after. If you want to change your XI send it now or if you really care you can calculate the seeding yourself by removing disqualified votes, which is what I'm going to have to do.
Sir_Didier_Drogba, I didn't know if I should re do it or not but no one really spoke up one way or another and there's been plenty of days to do so. I think the fair thing to do is redoing them so that's the direction I'm going.
Sir_Didier_Drogba, I didn't know if I should re do it or not but no one really spoke up one way or another and there's been plenty of days to do so. I think the fair thing to do is redoing them so that's the direction I'm going.
Sir Didier Drogba
Head Official
is it realistically gonna change the four that go through?
The voting stage has been a total buzzkill. The slow pace while it's only a copy and paste job, the overblown drama, the re-doing of the QF's (when? it's been over a week). I also dislike there are no team names, there may be some extra bias involved with the usernames as team names (I think I saw some comments suggesting that). I hope it regains some steam, it seems dead now.
Sir Didier Drogba
Head Official
The qfs got a decent number of votes and the controversy made it fun but this delay has sapped all the momentum and the replay will basically kill it, I probably won't even bother voting in the replay.
chygry
Starting XI
Agreed, I noticed that as well. But I suppose you can get around it if you try not to look at the comments nor team names (as I did) before making your assessment and commenting regarding the teams in hand.Juventino;3957534 said:
Although it might be a little bit difficult for those who participate, and have been here all through the picking phase of the players. So it was a little different for me, also I guess there aren't many "outsiders" coming from FIFA or whatever forums to vote anyway or who haven't been around lately, which makes my suggestion kind of useless lol.
yoyo913
Team Captain
Redo of the standings:
Group A - all valid
Dytza 9
Xaviesta 5
Yoyo 10
Az 8
Group B
Arnau 5
cdiccico 6
Sir Didier 15
Shifty 6 (including fender's vote)
Cdiccico get's 2nd place because of more 3rd place votes (2 votes vs 0).
Group C
fender 2
pogba4now 11
poet 5
juventino 13
massive 7
Disqualified votes because of only voting twice: fender, kp41, Sepak, Mandieta6
Disqualified votes because of only voting once: jeetmusic
Seeding:
1. Group winner with most votes out of the 3 groups.
2. Group winner with 2nd most votes out of the 3 groups.
3. Group winner.
4. 2nd place with most votes out of the 3 groups.
5. 2nd place with 2nd most votes out of the 3 groups.
6. 2nd place.
7. 3rd place group C.
8. 3rd place with most votes from Group A & B.
New seedings:
1. Sir Didier
2. Juventino
3. Yoyo
4. pogba4now
5. Dytza
6. cdiccico
7. massive
8. Mandieta6
old seedings:
1. Sir Didier Drogba
2. Juventino
3. yoyo913
4. Pogba4Now
5. Dytza
6. ShiftyPowers
7. Poet
8. Mandieta6
New matchups: Juventino vs Massive, Yoyo vs Cdiccico
Sir Dider vs Mandieta6, Pogba vs Dytza have already been played so I won't repeat them.
Group A - all valid
Dytza 9
Xaviesta 5
Yoyo 10
Az 8
Group B
Arnau 5
cdiccico 6
Sir Didier 15
Shifty 6 (including fender's vote)
Cdiccico get's 2nd place because of more 3rd place votes (2 votes vs 0).
Group C
fender 2
pogba4now 11
poet 5
juventino 13
massive 7
Disqualified votes because of only voting twice: fender, kp41, Sepak, Mandieta6Disqualified votes because of only voting once: jeetmusic
Seeding:
1. Group winner with most votes out of the 3 groups.
2. Group winner with 2nd most votes out of the 3 groups.
3. Group winner.
4. 2nd place with most votes out of the 3 groups.
5. 2nd place with 2nd most votes out of the 3 groups.
6. 2nd place.
7. 3rd place group C.
8. 3rd place with most votes from Group A & B.
New seedings:
1. Sir Didier
2. Juventino
3. Yoyo
4. pogba4now
5. Dytza
6. cdiccico
7. massive
8. Mandieta6
old seedings:
1. Sir Didier Drogba
2. Juventino
3. yoyo913
4. Pogba4Now
5. Dytza
6. ShiftyPowers
7. Poet
8. Mandieta6
New matchups: Juventino vs Massive, Yoyo vs Cdiccico
Sir Dider vs Mandieta6, Pogba vs Dytza have already been played so I won't repeat them.
yoyo913
Team Captain
Haha... yeah this is kind of fucked up.
Not every match will be replayed. As I wrote above only 2/4 will be re-done because they are new match-ups. The other 2 have been done exact so no reason to re-do them.
I didn't do the team names since so few teams didn't supply one. I probably should have for the few that have.... fuck.
The reason 3 was obligatory is because we've never done 13 teams in a competition before, and it's what made most sense to me. Imo it was a good choice but people fucked up.
Not every match will be replayed. As I wrote above only 2/4 will be re-done because they are new match-ups. The other 2 have been done exact so no reason to re-do them.
I didn't do the team names since so few teams didn't supply one. I probably should have for the few that have.... fuck.
The reason 3 was obligatory is because we've never done 13 teams in a competition before, and it's what made most sense to me. Imo it was a good choice but people fucked up.
ShiftyPowers
Make America Great Again
Mandieta6;3957605 said:
Being in a group of 5 would significantly lessen the odds that one would advance as a top 3rd place vote getter. I think it's more or less fair to guarantee that group a spot and have the other two groups fight it out on equal terms for the final knockout place. Now, why he made everyone vote for 3 instead of 2... I guess it just makes more sense if 3 are guaranteed to advance.
chygry
Starting XI
At this stage it sounds like the ones in command of making the Euros a 24-team tournament and trying to make the World Cup into a 40 team one are you guys lol.
All kidding aside, it's probably not the right thread for it, but still worthy of a discussion. What do you all think about those last Euros extended to 24 teams? Or has this all been discussed before?
IMO it really degraded the quality of the tournament a A LOT. When teams knew that basically 3 draws without winning a single match in the group stage was enough to advance, it fucked things up. Portugal for example who won the tournament eventually, didn't win a single of them. Two of their knock-out matches went to penalties if I'm not mistaken, and they beat Croatia by some Quaresma extra-time goal. So all in all they won the tournament just by winning two matches in the extra-time (including the final)? Sorry if I'm a little mistaken by some facts here, but the point remains the same.
Us as the spectators and fans of the sport want to see the most entertaining football as possible, let's be honest. Yeah okay it's good that "lesser" nations got a chance as well during the last Euros. But would anyone of you agree that you enjoyed Iceland or whatever team playing like them (reminiscent of Greece 2004) getting that far? It was nice to see Wales for example, lead by Bale and their whole systemized group reaching that far though.
When teams know that you don't really need to win any matches during the group stage and maintain a positive goal difference, then it leads to less interesting matches for a neutral individual. And in the end - football has become sort of an entertainment, so what I witnessed (at least me) was not enjoyable.
Me for example enjoyed Copa América Centenario a lot more than those Euros for example. The football that was being on display was more enthusiastic, intensive and energetic with end-to-end stuff being played at all times. I even woke up at bizarre hours at night (or didn't sleep at all) in order to watch those matches. There were so many quality ones compared to the Euros, not that the latter was completely shit either. Opinions vary though.
Remember when back in 2008, 2012 even, you had the best nations in the groups, and basically had no boring matches - since all of the teams knew they had to win at all costs and just not sit back and defend hoping that some draw gets them through. Also there were so many boring matches in the knock-out phase with them dragging on to penalties after 0-0.
Just felt like I had to get it out of my system.
Thoughts?
All kidding aside, it's probably not the right thread for it, but still worthy of a discussion. What do you all think about those last Euros extended to 24 teams? Or has this all been discussed before?
IMO it really degraded the quality of the tournament a A LOT. When teams knew that basically 3 draws without winning a single match in the group stage was enough to advance, it fucked things up. Portugal for example who won the tournament eventually, didn't win a single of them. Two of their knock-out matches went to penalties if I'm not mistaken, and they beat Croatia by some Quaresma extra-time goal. So all in all they won the tournament just by winning two matches in the extra-time (including the final)? Sorry if I'm a little mistaken by some facts here, but the point remains the same.
Us as the spectators and fans of the sport want to see the most entertaining football as possible, let's be honest. Yeah okay it's good that "lesser" nations got a chance as well during the last Euros. But would anyone of you agree that you enjoyed Iceland or whatever team playing like them (reminiscent of Greece 2004) getting that far? It was nice to see Wales for example, lead by Bale and their whole systemized group reaching that far though.
When teams know that you don't really need to win any matches during the group stage and maintain a positive goal difference, then it leads to less interesting matches for a neutral individual. And in the end - football has become sort of an entertainment, so what I witnessed (at least me) was not enjoyable.
Me for example enjoyed Copa América Centenario a lot more than those Euros for example. The football that was being on display was more enthusiastic, intensive and energetic with end-to-end stuff being played at all times. I even woke up at bizarre hours at night (or didn't sleep at all) in order to watch those matches. There were so many quality ones compared to the Euros, not that the latter was completely shit either. Opinions vary though.
Remember when back in 2008, 2012 even, you had the best nations in the groups, and basically had no boring matches - since all of the teams knew they had to win at all costs and just not sit back and defend hoping that some draw gets them through. Also there were so many boring matches in the knock-out phase with them dragging on to penalties after 0-0.
Just felt like I had to get it out of my system.
Thoughts?
Sir Didier Drogba
Head Official
A Juventino-Sir Didier showdown!
And is this the first final ever without Messi or Ronaldo?
And is this the first final ever without Messi or Ronaldo?