• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

SG's Babe Competition 2010

Daz

Everyone's Favourite Diabetic
hmmm... I'll take a typical outside shot and go for Nikki Whelan.

I'll PM some pics.
 

Mandieta6

Red Card - Life
Life Ban
Xifio;2884856 said:
we need some [sure to be unseeded] outsiders ... I'll go with Catrinel Menghia


That's the opposite of what we need. This is a competition where Dakota Fanning is a shoe-in for top seed.

Watson had previously been a wildcard, with Tom regularly nominating Kiera.

There are so few attractive babes this time around. Regulars like Scarlett and Alba (and Watson, ugh) haven't even been nominated.
 

Xifio

The Von Trapps
Mandieta6;2884896 said:
That's the opposite of what we need. This is a competition where Dakota Fanning is a shoe-in for top seed.
what? how does that make it the opposite of what we need?

I think a hot unseeded chick vs. a top-seeded actress who made her name because of her maturity of acting performances at a young age (and not too much else) would be excellent ... it would be boring if it was just a face-off of star celebs ...
 

MaSsiVe

Manager
Staff member
Moderator
I agree that it kind of sucks to have mostly the same nominees every year...there are bitches winning thing thing for their name alone :willis:


...I don't really care though.
 

mrromaniac

Reserve Team
Xifio;2884856 said:
we need some [sure to be unseeded] outsiders ... I'll go with Catrinel Menghia


Yeah! I dunno what was I going to do if there were no Romanian babes in the competition...
 

Mandieta6

Red Card - Life
Life Ban
Xifio;2884914 said:
what? how does that make it the opposite of what we need?

I think a hot unseeded chick vs. a top-seeded actress who made her name because of her maturity of acting performances at a young age (and not too much else) would be excellent ... it would be boring if it was just a face-off of star celebs ...

Have you looked at the current list? Most of them are relatively unknown and therefor qualify as 'unseeded beauties'. Because there's so many, an unattractive celeb like Dakota gets pushed up the ladder, and becomes a top seed. The best things would be to have a balance of famous, established babes, and unknown ones.

It takes away from the underdog factor if everyone is an underdog.

Shifty, I'm ignoring you. You're more than welcome to bribe someone else to nominate for you, though.
 

nor-rbk

Head Official
Moderator
I'll nominate the same girl as last year, Evangeline Lilly.

Forwarded the same PM from last year, Az.
 

King

My ass smells like your mom
Mandieta6;2885439 said:
....an unattractive celeb like Dakota....
**** you if you don't get hard on from her. I am sure more then half of the SG members have already beaten off to her or are currently doing it.
 

Mandieta6

Red Card - Life
Life Ban
Xifio;2885495 said:
there are only a couple of names that are relatively unknown to me ... but like someone mentioned, it is good to see some newer names in the competition, instead of the same contests year after year ... don't know what you're concerned about: Dakota, no matter if she's top-seeded, will get knocked out in the Group Stage if people are voting on hotness ...

It is good, that's why I said a balance of established names and new names is best. Dakota Fanning was just an example, and I'm not concerned about anything, I was just responding to your erroneous notion that you were being unique in your choice of babe. At least that was the impression I got.
 


Top