• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

The Moment of Truth: Republican Primary

R

Rob

Mourinho’s Assistant
Parra Power;2459841 said:
'avin a laugh.


Hawke is king, where Whitlam is god.
Click to expand...
Please.

Whitlam is the worst Prime Minister in Australia's history.
Hawke is the 3rd best Prime Minister, did many good things such as floating the currency and de-regulating a lot of industries. (just not enough).
 
R

Run DMB

MVP
Dragan T;2460105 said:
Is that Steauauaeaa Bucharest's biggest rival?
Click to expand...
Yes, in fact it was Romania's dominant club until the late 1950's, when the club then known as "Staua" decided to add a fourth vowel to its name - e. With four consecutive vowels, the club set a new Romanian record. Due to Romanians' penchant for long, random, chaotically arranged strings of vowels, the club quickly gained popularity.

Romanians' infatuation with vowels can be traced back to the early 14th century, when the Wallachians invaded the Kingdom of Poland after King Przemysł II issued a decree declaring consonants as inherently superior to vowels. It was a particularly nasty war, with key battles in the cities of Krzsistzastn and Eaueneoa.
 
$

$teauA

Superstar
Run DMB;2460155 said:
Yes, in fact it was Romania's dominant club until the late 1950's, when the club then known as "Staua" decided to add a fourth vowel to its name - e. With four consecutive vowels, the club set a new Romanian record. Due to Romanians' penchant for long, random, chaotically arranged strings of vowels, the club quickly gained popularity.

Romanians' infatuation with vowels can be traced back to the early 14th century, when the Wallachians invaded the Kingdom of Poland after King Przemysł II issued a decree declaring consonants as inherently superior to vowels. It was a particularly nasty war, with key battles in the cities of Krzsistzastn and Eaueneoa.
Click to expand...

Hahaha love it (H)(Y)


PS: still voting democrat
 
U

Ubik Valis

Croatian Viking
Run DMB;2460155 said:
Yes, in fact it was Romania's dominant club until the late 1950's, when the club then known as "Staua" decided to add a fourth vowel to its name - e. With four consecutive vowels, the club set a new Romanian record. Due to Romanians' penchant for long, random, chaotically arranged strings of vowels, the club quickly gained popularity.

Romanians' infatuation with vowels can be traced back to the early 14th century, when the Wallachians invaded the Kingdom of Poland after King Przemysł II issued a decree declaring consonants as inherently superior to vowels. It was a particularly nasty war, with key battles in the cities of Krzsistzastn and Eaueneoa.
Click to expand...



Ah yes, reminds of what I read about Bosnia in uncyclopedia:

Bosnia abolished approximately 95% of its Vowels in The Great Vowel Purge (Velika Čistka Samoglasnika) of 1944, after discovering that they had been collaborating with the Nazi occupiers of the country. The diacritical marks of the language attempted to exploit the resulting confusion, and succeeded in wresting control of 30% of the language, forming the breakaway province "Řêpǚbłĩká Đĭàķŕitīkǻ". Thus, 90% of the population still doesnt understand how to use four of the sonstants correctly. Between 1944 and 1992, Bosnia was ruled by the letter 'j' under a system of Non-Aligned Consonantism, which was finally overthrown in 1992, its position bieng taken by the leter 'h'.
Click to expand...

(H)
 
S

::shinji::

Min
I pity you guys and the world if Giuliani gets elected. I just recently saw an interview with him asking his thoughts on the recent situation in Pakistan and he couldn't give one decent answer or thought of his own, just sound byte after sound byte... "war on terror, blah, blah, blah" ..."9/11, blah, blah" ...Al Qaeda, 9/11, Osama!"

reminded me of George Bush in the debates with Kerry, couldn't produce one statement of his own..
 
ShiftyPowers

ShiftyPowers

Make America Great Again
Giuliani is being advised by all the neocons who were responsible for all of the pre-Iraq War stuff. He is much worse than Bush, and I think he might be even worse than Cheney.
 
S

SlayerDeuS

Starting XI
Mike Huckabee is a baptist minister. He is basically catering to the religious-right, but if anybody actually looks at his record he is fiscally liberal and not tough on crime. Two areas where most pubs with any influence are usually in agreement with their conservatism. He is basically feeding off of the socially conservative middle-class of our country. They don't call him "tax-hike Mike Huckabee the dumb f*ckabee" for nothing.
 
R

Run DMB

MVP
SlayerDeuS;2460972 said:
Mike Huckabee is a baptist minister. He is basically catering to the religious-right, but if anybody actually looks at his record he is fiscally liberal and not tough on crime. Two areas where most pubs with any influence are usually in agreement with their conservatism. He is basically feeding off of the socially conservative middle-class of our country. They don't call him "tax-hike Mike Huckabee the dumb f*ckabee" for nothing.
Click to expand...
Huckabee is not a fiscal liberal, he's a fiscal moderate. When I look at the major Republican candidates, I see nothing but big spenders. Romney wants to double Guantanamo Bay. Thompson wants to double the size of the military. Giuliani is trigger-happy, and wars cost money.

If the Republican nominee is either Giuliani or Romney, I might seriously consider voting Dem, or voting for a third-party candidate. I'm hoping for Huckabee or McCain. McCain/Pawlenty would be a great ticket.
 
J

Joe

Starting XI
Run DMB;2461186 said:
If the Republican nominee is either Giuliani or Romney, I might seriously consider voting Dem, or voting for a third-party candidate. I'm hoping for Huckabee or McCain. McCain/Pawlenty would be a great ticket.
Click to expand...

Wait, you really are a Republican? I thought it was all a joke. :o
 
R

Rob

Mourinho’s Assistant
Run DMB;2461186 said:
Huckabee is not a fiscal liberal, he's a fiscal moderate. When I look at the major Republican candidates, I see nothing but big spenders. Romney wants to double Guantanamo Bay. Thompson wants to double the size of the military. Giuliani is trigger-happy, and wars cost money.

If the Republican nominee is either Giuliani or Romney, I might seriously consider voting Dem, or voting for a third-party candidate. I'm hoping for Huckabee or McCain. McCain/Pawlenty would be a great ticket.
Click to expand...
My political compass is +10 in economics.

CUT GOVERNMENT SPENDING! :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.


Top