• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

The most annoying club team

theo

VII
It has to be Dinamo Bucharest. Well at least for the romanians.
They always sign 24-year-olds from countries with a low level of football (Bosnia, Belarus, Latvia, Angola, etc.), and say that they'll be the future's leading football players in Europe, yet they are total flops. For example, their coach just compared an Ecuadorian striker that they signed with Cisse, Trezeguet and Henry in the same time!! Get over yourselves already!

No worries though, they've always been crap and always will.
 

AdidAs

Banned [Multiple Accounts]
Life Ban
Theo;2276753 said:
It has to be Dinamo Bucharest. Well at least for the romanians.
They always sign 24-year-olds from countries with a low level of football (Bosnia, Belarus, Latvia, Angola, etc.), and say that they'll be the future's leading football players in Europe, yet they are total flops. For example, their coach just compared an Ecuadorian striker that they signed with Cisse, Trezeguet and Henry in the same time!! Get over yourselves already!

No worries though, they've always been crap and always will.

Same crap happens with Dynamo Kiev. Our stupid manager signs those skilless players from Latin America whose name i hear for the first time, and nobody even cares that they exist. And our i comparing bunch to those Henry and Cisse too, but what i see is him playing for second team.
In 1999 we reached 1/2 of CL with full Ukrainian squad, and now we doomed in qualifying there. It's just whole embarrassment for the fans to see what their team been turned into in just 3-4 years (We had this going since 2002-2003 season)
 

Hepoas

Account closed
Life Ban
Theo;2276753 said:
It has to be Dinamo Bucharest. Well at least for the romanians.
They always sign 24-year-olds from countries with a low level of football (Bosnia, Belarus, Latvia, Angola, etc.), and say that they'll be the future's leading football players in Europe, yet they are total flops. For example, their coach just compared an Ecuadorian striker that they signed with Cisse, Trezeguet and Henry in the same time!! Get over yourselves already!

No worries though, they've always been crap and always will.

I recognize that with FC Lyn Oslo. They said that every nigerians player biggest dream was to play for FC Lyn. :sleep:
 

adobe_sun

Youth Team
AdidAs;2276794 said:
Same crap happens with Dynamo Kiev. Our stupid manager signs those skilless players from Latin America whose name i hear for the first time, and nobody even cares that they exist. And our i comparing bunch to those Henry and Cisse too, but what i see is him playing for second team.
In 1999 we reached 1/2 of CL with full Ukrainian squad, and now we doomed in qualifying there. It's just whole embarrassment for the fans to see what their team been turned into in just 3-4 years (We had this going since 2002-2003 season)

The same thing happens with our CSKA. They're mainly buying players from abroad (Senegal, Moroco, etc.) claiming to be good. Some of them turn to be miserable, some don't, but the truth is, CSKA has always bad outcome according to the big expectations of the public. This is happening at least since 2002, when CSKA beated Shakhtar 3-0 and progressed higher in UEFA cup. ALso last year they beated Liverpool 1-0 at Anfield and Bayer 04 two times with 1-0 and did it higher, but they were crap this year.
I think this politics of buying players like these is a whole bunch of horse**** :boohoo: :jambo: I like teams relying on their own academy players.

Arsenal and Chelsea are hardly doing that, so they might be brought to the ****list as well .:boyaka:
 

night

Starting XI
I remember a time when Pogoń Szczecin (my local team) fielded 10 unknown Brazilians in their starting lineup with the belief that all Brazilians are gods at football. Now that is really sad.
 

PaPaGeorGeo

Fan Favourite
adobe_sun;2276901 said:
Arsenal and Chelsea are hardly doing that, so they might be brought to the ****list as well .:boyaka:


You might as well hate every good team in Europe then, I cant think of many teams that have more than 2 academy players in the first team
 

adobe_sun

Youth Team
PaPaGeorGeo;2277228 said:
You might as well hate every good team in Europe then, I cant think of many teams that have more than 2 academy players in the first team

Wrong. Man United had at least 6-7 players form their academy in the core 25 group of players during the 98/99 season. ;)
Pool were using a lot of their academy players trhough the latest years as well.
 

didy

Red Card - 1-12-08 - Posting pornographic material
Life Ban
night;2276924 said:
I remember a time when Pogoń Szczecin (my local team) fielded 10 unknown Brazilians in their starting lineup with the belief that all Brazilians are gods at football. Now that is really sad.
Lol that reminds me of the time K.S.K. Beveren a Belgium team fielded 11 Ivorian players. Well now every second player on that team is either from the Ivory Coast or some other African country because of their youth academies in Africa.
 
night;2276924 said:
I remember a time when Pogoń Szczecin (my local team) fielded 10 unknown Brazilians in their starting lineup with the belief that all Brazilians are gods at football. Now that is really sad.

That's what like 90% of Portuguese teams do.. :nape:

The mentality that every Brazilian is a football god like you mentioned combined with the fact that Brazil is still an inexpensive market is why this happens. Granted it's true that there are lots of unknown players in Brazil that have what it takes to succeed in Europe, but it's really annoying when some smaller team (bigger one's too) announces that they've found a real "craque" in Brazil...only to be another over-hyped flop once he's played a few games. I'm all for limits on foreign players because of this...

this is probably the main reason why Portugal can't produce a world-class striker, every team in the BWin Liga has the so-called "next" Romario or Adriano playing for them.. (:/)
 

night

Starting XI
::shinji::;2277315 said:
That's what like 90% of Portuguese teams do.. :nape:

The mentality that every Brazilian is a football god like you mentioned combined with the fact that Brazil is still an inexpensive market is why this happens. Granted it's true that there are lots of unknown players in Brazil that have what it takes to succeed in Europe, but it's really annoying when some smaller team (bigger one's too) announces that they've found a real "craque" in Brazil...only to be another over-hyped flop once he's played a few games. I'm all for limits on foreign players because of this...

I'm also for limits on foreign players. Another reason for that is because those unknown foreign players rob the chances of local players emerging from the youth team/reserves who actually have the potential but are never given a chance to improve. In my opinion, more than half of the starting eleven or overall squad should be players from the league's country.
 

Kiwi land

Red Card - Multiple Accounts (Permanent)
Life Ban
PaPaGeorGeo;2277228 said:
You might as well hate every good team in Europe then, I cant think of many teams that have more than 2 academy players in the first team

Boro as well.
 

Kiwi land

Red Card - Multiple Accounts (Permanent)
Life Ban
adobe_sun;2277240 said:
Wrong. Man United had at least 6-7 players form their academy in the core 25 group of players during the 98/99 season. ;)
Pool were using a lot of their academy players trhough the latest years as well.

Who the f*** cares, if a team in europe can't hold on to their talented youth players. Anyway at the end of the day you can't blam chelsea, arsenal, newcastle, man u, and so on for buying young talented players in europe, they want to win every cup that is possible,and they will try to buy players that will do the job. At the end day it is the "player's" deicision.
 

night

Starting XI
I hate it how people just put the names of the teams they hate with no explanation to why that team is "most annoying".
 

Kiwi land

Red Card - Multiple Accounts (Permanent)
Life Ban
night;2277540 said:
I'm also for limits on foreign players. Another reason for that is because those unknown foreign players rob the chances of local players emerging from the youth team/reserves who actually have the potential but are never given a chance to improve. In my opinion, more than half of the starting eleven or overall squad should be players from the league's country.

B*LL**** may be 2 or 3. Let just face it's not the manager's problem if english youth players are not as good as europe player or other part of the world. May be it a good lesson in life not to sit around being lazy eating pie's in front of the tv at young age, which 3rd world countries have. Not like the African's who don't have tv, so they play football(soccer) every day and that why they are better at a young age.
 

night

Starting XI
Kiwi land;2277557 said:
B*LL**** may be 2 or 3. Let just face it's not the manager's problem if english youth players are not as good as europe player or other part of the world. May be it a good lesson in life not to sit around being lazy eating pie's in front of the tv at young age, which 3rd world countries have. Not like the African's who don't have tv, so they play football(soccer) every day and that why they are better at a young age.
"Sit around being lazy eating pies in front of the tv at young age"? That's just random and so are you if you call that a reason to why foreign players are playing for top English clubs in their starting lineups.
 

Kiwi land

Red Card - Multiple Accounts (Permanent)
Life Ban
night;2277555 said:
I hate it how people just put the names of the teams they hate with no explanation to why that team is "most annoying".

:jambo: Ok just for u mate. Spurs because they are spurs, Chelsea becuase they have brought their success:kader: , and their quick rise to glory:boohoo: . Man U, because they are the biggest club in the world in term of fan base:mad: , and Sir Alex:Bow: , and the one-eye fans on this forum.:rolleyes:
 

Kiwi land

Red Card - Multiple Accounts (Permanent)
Life Ban
night;2277561 said:
"Sit around being lazy eating pies in front of the tv at young age"? That's just random and so are you if you call that a reason to why foreign players are playing for top English clubs in their starting lineups.

It one of the many few. The Drinking as well,i.e J. Pennant, he was good enough for Arsenal, but off field a different story.

And they costed a truck full, Walcott 12 million, Rooney ??

Any way was this directed at Arsenal, i hint a bit of jealousy:mexican:.

Worried about the future mate already.:rofl:
 

night

Starting XI
Kiwi land;2277571 said:
Any way was this directed at Arsenal, i hint a bit of jealousy.
Haha directed at Arsenal? The reason I brought this foreign players issue is because my local team at one point fielded 10 Brazilian players in its starting lineup and I prefer seeing Polish players from the youth team fulfilling their potential instead. Did you read this thread or just clicked on the last page?
Besides, I don't think you gave a single reason that justifies why foreign players get first team spots ahead of local players. Drinking? Watching tv and eating pies? What the hell?
 


Top